Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ir.swu.ac.th/jspui/handle/123456789/17584
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAhmad A.
dc.contributor.authorAhmad W.
dc.contributor.authorChaiyasarn K.
dc.contributor.authorOstrowski K.A.
dc.contributor.authorAslam F.
dc.contributor.authorZajdel P.
dc.contributor.authorJoyklad P.
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-10T13:17:41Z-
dc.date.available2022-03-10T13:17:41Z-
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.issn20734360
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85116312721
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.swu.ac.th/jspui/handle/123456789/17584-
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85116312721&doi=10.3390%2fpolym13193389&partnerID=40&md5=85b8d04195a27ee1120672e0aca36bea
dc.description.abstractThe innovation of geopolymer concrete (GPC) plays a vital role not only in reducing the environmental threat but also as an exceptional material for sustainable development. The application of supervised machine learning (ML) algorithms to forecast the mechanical properties of concrete also has a significant role in developing the innovative environment in the field of civil engineering. This study was based on the use of the artificial neural network (ANN), boosting, and AdaBoost ML approaches, based on the python coding to predict the compressive strength (CS) of high calcium fly-ash-based GPC. The performance comparison of both the employed techniques in terms of prediction reveals that the ensemble ML approaches, AdaBoost, and boosting were more effective than the individual ML technique (ANN). The boosting indicates the highest value of R2 equals 0.96, and AdaBoost gives 0.93, while the ANN model was less accurate, indicating the coefficient of determination value equals 0.87. The lesser values of the errors, MAE, MSE, and RMSE of the boosting technique give 1.69 MPa, 4.16 MPa, and 2.04 MPa, respectively, indicating the high accuracy of the boosting algorithm. However, the statistical check of the errors (MAE, MSE, RMSE) and k-fold cross-validation method confirms the high precision of the boosting technique. In addition, the sensitivity analysis was also introduced to evaluate the contribution level of the input parameters towards the prediction of CS of GPC. The better accuracy can be achieved by incorporating other ensemble ML techniques such as AdaBoost, bagging, and gradient boosting. © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
dc.languageen
dc.subjectAdaptive boosting
dc.subjectCompressive strength
dc.subjectConcretes
dc.subjectFly ash
dc.subjectGeopolymers
dc.subjectInorganic polymers
dc.subjectNeural networks
dc.subjectSensitivity analysis
dc.subjectSlags
dc.subjectSupervised learning
dc.subjectSustainable development
dc.subjectCoefficient of determination
dc.subjectConcrete compressive strength
dc.subjectEnvironment
dc.subjectEnvironmental threats
dc.subjectGeopolymer concrete
dc.subjectMachine learning algorithms
dc.subjectMachine learning approaches
dc.subjectMachine learning techniques
dc.subjectProperties of concretes
dc.subjectSupervised machine learning
dc.subjectForecasting
dc.titlePrediction of geopolymer concrete compressive strength using novel machine learning algorithms
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.holderScopus
dc.identifier.bibliograpycitationPolymers. Vol 13, No.19 (2021)
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/polym13193389
Appears in Collections:Scopus 1983-2021

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in SWU repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.