Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ir.swu.ac.th/jspui/handle/123456789/17548
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Xu Y. | |
dc.contributor.author | Ahmad W. | |
dc.contributor.author | Ahmad A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Ostrowski K.A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Dudek M. | |
dc.contributor.author | Aslam F. | |
dc.contributor.author | Joyklad P. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-03-10T13:17:28Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-03-10T13:17:28Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 19961944 | |
dc.identifier.other | 2-s2.0-85119719583 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://ir.swu.ac.th/jspui/handle/123456789/17548 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85119719583&doi=10.3390%2fma14227034&partnerID=40&md5=da8c218fcf1c32f7dc055df196525916 | |
dc.description.abstract | The current trend in modern research revolves around novel techniques that can predict the characteristics of materials without consuming time, effort, and experimental costs. The adapta-tion of machine learning techniques to compute the various properties of materials is gaining more attention. This study aims to use both standalone and ensemble machine learning techniques to forecast the 28-day compressive strength of high-performance concrete. One standalone technique (support vector regression (SVR)) and two ensemble techniques (AdaBoost and random forest) were applied for this purpose. To validate the performance of each technique, coefficient of determination (R2), statistical, and k-fold cross-validation checks were used. Additionally, the contribution of input parameters towards the prediction of results was determined by applying sensitivity analysis. It was proven that all the techniques employed showed improved performance in predicting the out-comes. The random forest model was the most accurate, with an R2 value of 0.93, compared to the support vector regression and AdaBoost models, with R2 values of 0.83 and 0.90, respectively. In addition, statistical and k-fold cross-validation checks validated the random forest model as the best performer based on lower error values. However, the prediction performance of the support vector regression and AdaBoost models was also within an acceptable range. This shows that novel machine learning techniques can be used to predict the mechanical properties of high-performance concrete. © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. | |
dc.language | en | |
dc.subject | Compressive strength | |
dc.subject | Decision trees | |
dc.subject | Forecasting | |
dc.subject | High performance concrete | |
dc.subject | Machine learning | |
dc.subject | Random forests | |
dc.subject | Regression analysis | |
dc.subject | Sensitivity analysis | |
dc.subject | Vectors | |
dc.subject | High-perfor-mance concrete | |
dc.subject | High-performance concrete | |
dc.subject | K fold cross validations | |
dc.subject | Machine learning techniques | |
dc.subject | Performance | |
dc.subject | Random forest modeling | |
dc.subject | Random forests | |
dc.subject | Support vector regression models | |
dc.subject | Support vector regressions | |
dc.subject | Validation checks | |
dc.subject | Adaptive boosting | |
dc.title | Computation of high-performance concrete compressive strength using standalone and ensembled machine learning techniques | |
dc.type | Article | |
dc.rights.holder | Scopus | |
dc.identifier.bibliograpycitation | Materials. Vol 14, No.22 (2021) | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.3390/ma14227034 | |
Appears in Collections: | Scopus 1983-2021 |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in SWU repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.