Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ir.swu.ac.th/jspui/handle/123456789/17485
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorIntarakamhang U.
dc.contributor.authorPimthong S.
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-10T13:17:14Z-
dc.date.available2022-03-10T13:17:14Z-
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.issn17411041
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85105172112
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.swu.ac.th/jspui/handle/123456789/17485-
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85105172112&doi=10.1504%2fIJPSPM.2021.114587&partnerID=40&md5=2d2055fc2d5ddb9e2a252cd7011e57e9
dc.description.abstractThis mixed methodology research aims to evaluate the probationary performance of Thai Government officials in order to obtain the suggestion for improving the criteria and method of probationary performance. The qualitative research started from an interview with executives, followed by the survey on behaviours of new generation and opinion survey on probationary performance among government officials. Content analysis and multiple regression analysis were applied. According to the findings, data from every source agreed that the main function of probationary performance is to be the last step in selecting qualified government officials suitable for specific agencies. The factors of organisation culture of government agencies, the nature of Thai Government officials, and behaviours of the new generation can forecast the decision of new generation to work in civil service by 56.90%. The result suggested that the probationary period should be six months. It is also recommended that e-learning and general seminar among officials during probationary period as should not be part of the judgment criteria, but be under supervision of supervisors. In addition, the ratio of performance and behavioural score should be maintained at 50:50, but the minimum score of each attribute is 60%, and the minimum total score is 70%. Copyright © 2021 Inderscience Enterprises Ltd.
dc.languageen
dc.titleEvaluation of probationary performance of Thai Government officials
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.holderScopus
dc.identifier.bibliograpycitationInternational Journal of Public Sector Performance Management. Vol 7, No.3 (2021), p.287-300
dc.identifier.doi10.1504/IJPSPM.2021.114587
Appears in Collections:Scopus 1983-2021

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in SWU repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.