Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ir.swu.ac.th/jspui/handle/123456789/17297
Title: | Efficacy and safety of a novel water-soluble herbal patch for acne vulgaris treatment: A randomized, assessor-blinds controlled, intra-individual split-face comparative study |
Authors: | Jaturapisanukul K. Udompataikul M. Kanokrungsee S. Rojhirunsakool S. Kamanamool N. Rachpirom M. Puttarak P. |
Keywords: | alginic acid alpha tocopherol ascorbic acid Centella asiatica extract Cornus officinalis extract Emblica officinalis extract glycerol antiinfective agent clindamycin water acne acne vulgaris adult Article clinical article clinical outcome colorimetry comedo comparative study controlled study device safety erythema female human inflammation male median survival time papule patch test patient satisfaction physical examination randomized controlled trial young adult acne vulgaris double blind procedure skin treatment outcome Acne Vulgaris Anti-Bacterial Agents Clindamycin Double-Blind Method Humans Skin Treatment Outcome Water |
Issue Date: | 2021 |
Abstract: | Acne vulgaris is a chronic inflammatory skin disease. Antibiotics, particularly clindamycin and erythromycin, are used for the treatment of acne vulgaris. However, emerging antibiotic-resistant strains have been an important problem. This study aims to evaluate the efficiency and safety of a novel water-soluble herbal acne patch (WHAP) compared with the hydrocolloid acne patch (HAP) in mild to moderate inflammatory acne patients. The randomized, assessor-blind controlled, intra-individual split-face study was performed on 49 acne patients. The clinical outcomes were evaluated on day 2, 4, 7, 9, and 11 of treatment. It was shown that the median time to resolution of the inflammatory acne treated with WHAP was shorter than HAP with a statistically significant difference (WHAP was 4 days, whereas HAP was 6 days) (P value <.001). Moreover, WHAP had a more significant decrease in the rate of inflammatory diameter, erythema scores (by clinical and colorimetry), and a more increase in the rate of lightness scores (by colorimetry) than HAP (P value <.05). No adverse effects were reported in both groups. It is safe to use WHAP as an alternative treatment for inflammatory acne. © 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC. |
URI: | https://ir.swu.ac.th/jspui/handle/123456789/17297 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85102365061&doi=10.1111%2fdth.14925&partnerID=40&md5=5a8a7980f38e0ba6fb92a012ee82ea66 |
ISSN: | 13960296 |
Appears in Collections: | Scopus 1983-2021 |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in SWU repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.