Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ir.swu.ac.th/jspui/handle/123456789/15315
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChanpattana W.
dc.contributor.authorKirdcharoen N.
dc.contributor.authorTechakasem P.
dc.contributor.authorChakrabhand M.L.S.
dc.contributor.authorTuntirungsee Y.
dc.contributor.authorPrasertsuk Y.
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-05T04:33:30Z-
dc.date.available2021-04-05T04:33:30Z-
dc.date.issued1999
dc.identifier.issn1252208
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-0033144887
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.swu.ac.th/jspui/handle/123456789/15315-
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-0033144887&partnerID=40&md5=697be7f4529abbdfae42a7d0568fab2f
dc.description.abstractBackground: Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) has been used to treat schizophrenia since its inception in 1938. Nonetheless, there has never been a research study documenting the efficacy of ECT in schizophrenia. All ECT studies suffered unexceptable methodological flaws. The authors hypothesized the 3-week stabilization period as: 1) a screening method for ECT responders, 2) a procedure for obtaining a homogeneous group of patients ideally suitable for the continuation treatment study, and, 3) as a part of our relapse criteria. Method: One hundred and fourteen schizophrenic patients received acute Phase I treatment with bilateral ECT and flupenthixol (12-24 mg/d). After the first sign of clinical improvement, all patients had to pass a 3-week stabilization period during which their clinical improvement had to be sustained. The patients had to receive at least 20 ECT treatments before being considered unresponsive to ECT. Fifty one patients enrolled in the continuation (Phase II) treatment study, and were randomized to the 3 treatment groups. Results: In Phase I study, 58 patients were ECT responders by our criteria, 43 were nonresponders, and 13 were drop-outs. Forty five patients either relapsed or completed the Phase II study, while 6 patients dropped out. By our relapse criteria, 6 of 15 relapsed in the combined C-ECT and flupenthixol group, and 14 of 15 relapsed in both the group treated with C-ECT alone or flupenthixol alone. The use of the stabilization period in this study could complete all three objectives previously described. Conclusions: The use of the stabilization period is very useful in ECT research in schizophrenia.
dc.subjectadolescent
dc.subjectadult
dc.subjectarticle
dc.subjectclinical protocol
dc.subjectclinical trial
dc.subjectcontrolled clinical trial
dc.subjectcontrolled study
dc.subjectelectroconvulsive therapy
dc.subjectfemale
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectmale
dc.subjectmethodology
dc.subjectmiddle aged
dc.subjectmultimodality cancer therapy
dc.subjectphase 1 clinical trial
dc.subjectphase 2 clinical trial
dc.subjectprospective study
dc.subjectrandomized controlled trial
dc.subjectschizophrenia
dc.subjectsingle blind procedure
dc.subjectstandard
dc.subjecttreatment outcome
dc.subjectAdolescent
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectClinical Protocols
dc.subjectCombined Modality Therapy
dc.subjectElectroconvulsive Therapy
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectMiddle Aged
dc.subjectProspective Studies
dc.subjectSchizophrenia
dc.subjectSingle-Blind Method
dc.subjectTreatment Outcome
dc.titleThe use of the stabilization period in electroconvulsive therapy research in schizophrenia : II. Implementation
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.holderScopus
dc.identifier.bibliograpycitationJournal of the Medical Association of Thailand. Vol 82, No.6 (1999), p.558-567
Appears in Collections:Scopus 1983-2021

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in SWU repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.