Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ir.swu.ac.th/jspui/handle/123456789/15224
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBurrow M.F.
dc.contributor.authorNopnakeepong U.
dc.contributor.authorPhrukkanon S.
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-05T04:33:05Z-
dc.date.available2021-04-05T04:33:05Z-
dc.date.issued2002
dc.identifier.issn1095641
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-0036582511
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.swu.ac.th/jspui/handle/123456789/15224-
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-0036582511&doi=10.1016%2fS0109-5641%2801%2900041-0&partnerID=40&md5=1d04d15419824de0ca9595752a0b0e7b
dc.description.abstractObjectives: Limited information exists with regard to the adhesive ability of glass ionomer cements (GIC) and recently developed resin-based dentin bond systems to primary dentin. The aim of this study was to compare the microtensile bond strength of a conventional GIC (Fuji IX), a resin-modified GIC (Fuji II LC), and two resin-based dentin adhesives (Prime and Bond NT with NRC and Single Bond). The bonded interfaces were also observed using field emission electron microscopy(FE-SEM). Methods: Microtensile bond test specimens were prepared on superficial dentin of primary and permanent molars. The specimens were bonded according to each manufacturer's instructions except for Prime and Bond NT/NRC which used Silux Plus resin composite instead of Dyract. Hour-glass shaped specimens were created (diameter of 1.2±0.02mm) and stressed in tension at a crosshead speed of 1mm/min. Results were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and LSD test, fracture modes were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U-test and Kruskall-Wallis test. Twelve specimens were prepared for each material on primary and permanent dentin. Samples were prepared in the same manner, then critical point dried, fractured and sputter-coated for the FE-SEM observations. Results: Two-way ANOVA showed the overall bond strengths were greater for the permanent dentin compared with primary dentin. However, for individual material comparisons no differences among the bond strengths to primary and permanent dentin for Fuji IX (9.7, 12.2MPa), Fuji II LC (16, 20.1MPa), Prime & Bond NT/NRC (18.1, 21.6MPa) and Single Bond (18.2, 21.6MPa), were detected. However, Fuji IX bond strengths were significantly lower than the other systems tested when bonded to either primary or permanent dentin (p<0.05). Failure mode showed cohesive failure of GIC and mostly adhesive failure for the resin-based adhesives. The FE-SEM observations showed hybrid-like layer formation for the GIC materials and hybrid layer formation for the resin-based adhesives. Significance: The materials tested would be suitable for bonding to either primary or permanent dentin, but the resin-modified GIC or resin-based systems are likely to provide a stronger bond than the conventional GIC, Fuji IX. © 2002 Academy of Dental Materials. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
dc.subjectAdhesives
dc.subjectBond strength (materials)
dc.subjectBonding
dc.subjectDental cement
dc.subjectGlass
dc.subjectIonomers
dc.subjectResins
dc.subjectScanning electron microscopy
dc.subjectTensile strength
dc.subjectTensile testing
dc.subjectDentin bonding agents
dc.subjectGlass ionomers
dc.subjectMicrotensile bond tests
dc.subjectPermanent dentin
dc.subjectPrimary dentin
dc.subjectDental materials
dc.subjectbisphenol A bis(2 hydroxypropyl) ether dimethacrylate
dc.subjectcompomer
dc.subjectdentin bonding agent
dc.subjectDyract
dc.subjectFuji II LC cement
dc.subjectfuji IX
dc.subjectglass ionomer
dc.subjectmaleic acid derivative
dc.subjectmethacrylic acid derivative
dc.subjectnon rinse conditioner
dc.subjectnon-rinse conditioner
dc.subjectpolymethacrylic acid derivative
dc.subjectPrime & Bond NT
dc.subjectresin
dc.subjectresin cement
dc.subjectsilicate
dc.subjectSilux Plus
dc.subjectsingle bond
dc.subjectanalysis of variance
dc.subjectarticle
dc.subjectchemistry
dc.subjectcomparative study
dc.subjectdeciduous tooth
dc.subjectdental acid etching
dc.subjectdental bonding
dc.subjectdentin
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectmaterials testing
dc.subjectmolar tooth
dc.subjectnonparametric test
dc.subjectscanning electron microscopy
dc.subjectstatistics
dc.subjectsurface property
dc.subjecttensile strength
dc.subjectultrastructure
dc.subjectAcid Etching, Dental
dc.subjectAnalysis of Variance
dc.subjectBisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate
dc.subjectCompomers
dc.subjectComposite Resins
dc.subjectDental Bonding
dc.subjectDentin
dc.subjectDentin-Bonding Agents
dc.subjectGlass Ionomer Cements
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectMaleates
dc.subjectMaterials Testing
dc.subjectMethacrylates
dc.subjectMicroscopy, Electron, Scanning
dc.subjectMolar
dc.subjectPolymethacrylic Acids
dc.subjectResin Cements
dc.subjectResins, Synthetic
dc.subjectSilicates
dc.subjectStatistics
dc.subjectStatistics, Nonparametric
dc.subjectSurface Properties
dc.subjectTensile Strength
dc.subjectTooth, Deciduous
dc.titleA comparison of microtensile bond strengths of several dentin bonding systems to primary and permanent dentin
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.holderScopus
dc.identifier.bibliograpycitationDental Materials. Vol 18, No.3 (2002), p.239-245
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/S0109-5641(01)00041-0
Appears in Collections:Scopus 1983-2021

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in SWU repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.