Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ir.swu.ac.th/jspui/handle/123456789/15186
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTangjitgamol S.
dc.contributor.authorManusirivithaya S.
dc.contributor.authorSheanakul C.
dc.contributor.authorLeelahakorn S.
dc.contributor.authorSripramote M.
dc.contributor.authorThawaramara T.
dc.contributor.authorKaewpila N.
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-05T04:32:53Z-
dc.date.available2021-04-05T04:32:53Z-
dc.date.issued2003
dc.identifier.issn1048891X
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-0642284876
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.swu.ac.th/jspui/handle/123456789/15186-
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-0642284876&doi=10.1046%2fj.1525-1438.2003.13192.x&partnerID=40&md5=cf2f12e926c5b76507a681df56a1131b
dc.description.abstractThis study endeavored to determine whether lymph node size is a reliable indicator in determining lymph node metastasis in common epithelial ovarian cancer. We reviewed pathologic sections of pelvic and para-aortic lymph nodes removed from 104 ovarian carcinoma patients who underwent either primary surgical staging or secondary surgery from January 1994 to July 2001. All sections of each individual node were measured in two dimensions. The different sizes of nodes were studied statistically to determine the optimal sensitivity and specificity in predicting cancer metastasis. A nodal size of 10 mm was a specific point of interest. Of 2069 total nodes obtained, 110 nodes (5.3%) had metastatic cancer. More than half (55.4%) of these positive nodes had a nodal long axis of 10 mm and less. The sensitivity and specificity of nodal size at 10 mm were 44.5% and 81.1%, respectively. We conclude that lymph node size is not a good indicator in determining epithelial ovarian cancer metastasis. Mere sampling of only the enlarged nodes does not reflect the true positive incidence of nodal metastasis. To avoid inaccurate staging and improper management, complete lymph node dissection is proposed as part of surgical staging for ovarian cancer.
dc.subjectcancer size
dc.subjectfemale
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjecthuman tissue
dc.subjectincidence
dc.subjectlymph node
dc.subjectlymph node metastasis
dc.subjectlymphadenectomy
dc.subjectmajor clinical study
dc.subjectovary carcinoma
dc.subjectpriority journal
dc.subjectreview
dc.subjectadenocarcinoma
dc.subjectarticle
dc.subjectcancer staging
dc.subjectlymph node
dc.subjectlymph node metastasis
dc.subjectlymphadenectomy
dc.subjectmethodology
dc.subjectmorphometrics
dc.subjectovary tumor
dc.subjectpathology
dc.subjectprediction and forecasting
dc.subjectAdenocarcinoma
dc.subjectBody Weights and Measures
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectLymph Node Excision
dc.subjectLymph Nodes
dc.subjectLymphatic Metastasis
dc.subjectNeoplasm Staging
dc.subjectOvarian Neoplasms
dc.subjectPredictive Value of Tests
dc.titleCan we rely on the size of the lymph node in determining nodal metastasis in ovarian carcinoma?
dc.typeReview
dc.rights.holderScopus
dc.identifier.bibliograpycitationInternational Journal of Gynecological Cancer. Vol 13, No.3 (2003), p.297-302
dc.identifier.doi10.1046/j.1525-1438.2003.13192.x
Appears in Collections:Scopus 1983-2021

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in SWU repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.