Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ir.swu.ac.th/jspui/handle/123456789/15094
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSuwimonteerabutr J.
dc.contributor.authorChaicumpa W.
dc.contributor.authorSaengjaruk P.
dc.contributor.authorTapchaisri P.
dc.contributor.authorChongsa-nguan M.
dc.contributor.authorKalambaheti T.
dc.contributor.authorRamasoota P.
dc.contributor.authorSakolvaree Y.
dc.contributor.authorVirakul P.
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-05T04:32:36Z-
dc.date.available2021-04-05T04:32:36Z-
dc.date.issued2005
dc.identifier.issn29645
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-20444463125
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.swu.ac.th/jspui/handle/123456789/15094-
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-20444463125&doi=10.2460%2fajvr.2005.66.762&partnerID=40&md5=a4dc33414f427579ec03e46d7550c30f
dc.description.abstractObjective - To evaluate the efficacy of a novel monoclonal antibody (MAb)-based dot-blot ELISA for detection of Leptospira antigens in urine samples of cattle. Sample population - Blood and urine samples of 45 test cattle from 5 farms in Chonburi province and 20 control cattle from 2 farms in Khon Kaen province in Thailand. Procedure - Blood and urine samples were assayed (microscopic agglutination test and urine antigen test) for Leptospira infection by use of an MAb-based dot-blot ELISA, and results for the ELISA were compared with those for dark-field microscopy (DFM), microbial culture, and a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay. Results - All urine samples with positive results for DFM, microbial culture, PCR assay, or > 1 of these tests also had positive results when tested by use of the MAb-based dot-blot ELISA, except for 1 sample that had positive results only for the PCR assay. Detection limits of the dot-blot ELISA were 103 leptospires/mL of urine and 9.3 ng of Leptospira homogenate. Comparison revealed that the diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, efficacy (accuracy), positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for the ELISA were in agreement with results for DFM (100%, 72.72%, 80%, 57.14%, and 100%, respectively), microbial culture (100%, 61.54%, 66.62%, 28.57%, and 100%, respectively), and PCR assay (95.45%, 100%, 91.77%, 100%, and 95.83%, respectively). Conclusions and clinical relevance - The MAb-based dot-blot ELISA is suitable as a tool for detecting leptospires in urine samples of cattle.
dc.subjectbacterial antigen
dc.subjectmonoclonal antibody
dc.subjectagglutination test
dc.subjectantigen detection
dc.subjectarticle
dc.subjectbacterium culture
dc.subjectbacterium detection
dc.subjectcattle
dc.subjectcontrolled study
dc.subjectdiagnostic accuracy
dc.subjectdiagnostic value
dc.subjectenzyme linked immunosorbent assay
dc.subjectfemale
dc.subjectintermethod comparison
dc.subjectLeptospira
dc.subjectleptospirosis
dc.subjectmale
dc.subjectmicroscopy
dc.subjectnonhuman
dc.subjectpolymerase chain reaction
dc.subjectprediction
dc.subjectsensitivity and specificity
dc.subjectThailand
dc.subjecturinalysis
dc.subjectAnimals
dc.subjectAntibodies, Monoclonal
dc.subjectCattle
dc.subjectCattle Diseases
dc.subjectEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectImmunoblotting
dc.subjectLeptospira
dc.subjectLeptospirosis
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectReproducibility of Results
dc.subjectSensitivity and Specificity
dc.subjectBos taurus
dc.subjectLeptospira
dc.titleEvaluation of a monoclonal antibody-based dot-blot ELISA for detection of leptospira spp inbovine urine samples
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.holderScopus
dc.identifier.bibliograpycitationAmerican Journal of Veterinary Research. Vol 66, No.5 (2005), p.762-766
dc.identifier.doi10.2460/ajvr.2005.66.762
Appears in Collections:Scopus 1983-2021

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in SWU repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.