Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ir.swu.ac.th/jspui/handle/123456789/14524
Title: | Comparative trial of moisturizer containing licochalcone A vs. hydrocortisone lotion in the treatment of childhood atopic dermatitis: A pilot study |
Authors: | Udompataikul M. Srisatwaja W. |
Keywords: | ceramide hydrocortisone lanolin alcohol licochalcone A linoleic acid adolescent article atopic dermatitis child clinical article drug efficacy dry skin edema erythema female human lichenoid eruption lotion male preschool child priority journal pruritus randomized controlled trial recurrence risk school child scoring of atopic dermatitis index scoring system skin excoriation statistical significance survival Administration, Cutaneous Adolescent Analysis of Variance Anti-Inflammatory Agents Chalcones Child Child, Preschool Dermatitis, Atopic Emollients Female Humans Hydrocortisone Infant Kaplan-Meier Estimate Male Patient Satisfaction Pilot Projects Recurrence Severity of Illness Index Single-Blind Method Treatment Outcome |
Issue Date: | 2011 |
Abstract: | Background Although moisturizer usage has been considered a mainstay of treatment for atopic dermatitis (AD) patients, few clinical studies have been investigated. Recently, moisturizers containing non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents, such as licochalcone A (LA) and vitamin B12 are of emerging interest. Objective To compare the effectiveness of moisturizer containing LA with hydrocortisone (HC) lotion in treatment of childhood AD. Methods The randomized, controlled, investigator-blinded 6-week study was conducted. Patients were administered with twice-daily application of LA lotion on one side of the body and HC lotion on the opposite side. The clinical outcome was assessed by the scoring of atopic dermatitis (SCORAD) index. The relapse rate was comparatively analysed by survival analysis. Results From 30 patients enrolled, 26 patients completed the protocol. The mean age of the children was 5.8 years. The average baseline SCORAD score is about 28 on both sides. The response rates of both agents were equal to 73.33%. There is no statistical significant group difference in reduction of SCORAD score. Although we observed more rapid resolution of oedema and erythema in areas treated with HC lotion, both agents exhibited no significant difference. The relapse rate of HC group was higher than in LA group; however, there was no significant difference. No side-effect was observed from both agents. Conclusion The effectiveness of LA lotion is equal to that of HC lotion. It was suggested that moisturizer containing LA could be used both for treatment of acute and maintenance phase in mild-to-moderate childhood AD. © 2010 European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology and Venereology. |
URI: | https://ir.swu.ac.th/jspui/handle/123456789/14524 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-79955928097&doi=10.1111%2fj.1468-3083.2010.03845.x&partnerID=40&md5=b1f628db4a1b2e77b435fc413babc2fa |
ISSN: | 9269959 |
Appears in Collections: | Scopus 1983-2021 |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in SWU repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.