Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ir.swu.ac.th/jspui/handle/123456789/14184
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNamiesnik J.
dc.contributor.authorVearasilp K.
dc.contributor.authorKupska M.
dc.contributor.authorHam K.-S.
dc.contributor.authorKang S.-G.
dc.contributor.authorPark Y.-K.
dc.contributor.authorBarasch D.
dc.contributor.authorNemirovski A.
dc.contributor.authorGorinstein S.
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-05T03:33:29Z-
dc.date.available2021-04-05T03:33:29Z-
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.issn14382377
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-84899424179
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.swu.ac.th/jspui/handle/123456789/14184-
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84899424179&doi=10.1007%2fs00217-013-2041-7&partnerID=40&md5=f73c5bec5513aab0ef58216b41cbcf23
dc.description.abstractThe objective of this study was to evaluate the antioxidant and binding effects of gooseberry, a less-studied berry, and to compare with blueberry and cranberry in the model of interaction with human serum albumin (HSA). The relationship between the scavenging properties of dietary polyphenols of the selected berries and their affinities for HSA were investigated by fluorescence analysis. In order to perform the extraction and identification of the antioxidants present in the samples, different types of extraction solvents were used, such as water, ethyl acetate, and diethyl ether. The polyphenols, tannins, anthocyanins and ascorbic acid contents, and the total antioxidant capacities (TACs) of the berry extracts were assessed by using ESI-MS, FTIR, and radical scavenging assays. The contents of bioactive compounds and the levels of TACs in water extracts differed significantly and were the highest in water extracts in comparison with other extracts in all the investigated berries (P < 0.05). Gooseberry water extracts contained: polyphenols (mg GAE/g DW)-5.37 ± 0.6, tannins (mg CE/g DW)-0.71 ± 0.2, anthocyanins (mg CGE/g DW)-12.0 ± 1.2, ascorbic acid (mg AA/g DW)-5.15 ± 0.5, and TACs (μMTE/g DW) by ABTS and FRAP assays were 15.53 ± 1.6 and 6.51 ± 0.7, respectively. In conclusion, the bioactivity of gooseberry was lower than blueberries and cranberries. The antioxidant and binding properties of gooseberries in comparison with widely consumed blueberries and cranberries can be used as a new source for food supplementation. © 2013 The Author(s).
dc.subjectAnthocyanins
dc.subjectAntioxidants
dc.subjectAscorbic acid
dc.subjectBinding energy
dc.subjectBioactivity
dc.subjectFruits
dc.subjectPlants (botany)
dc.subjectTannins
dc.subjectAnti-oxidant activities
dc.subjectBerries
dc.subjectBinding properties
dc.subjectBioactive components
dc.subjectBioactive compounds
dc.subjectFluorescence analysis
dc.subjectScavenging properties
dc.subjectTotal antioxidant capacity
dc.subjectExtraction
dc.subjectGrossulariaceae
dc.subjectVaccinium
dc.subjectVaccinium macrocarpon
dc.titleAntioxidant activities and bioactive components in some berries
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.holderScopus
dc.identifier.bibliograpycitationEuropean Food Research and Technology. Vol 237, No.5 (2013), p.819-829
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00217-013-2041-7
Appears in Collections:Scopus 1983-2021

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in SWU repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.