Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ir.swu.ac.th/jspui/handle/123456789/13909
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSongtish D.
dc.contributor.authorPraditsitthikorn N.
dc.contributor.authorTeerawattananon Y.
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-05T03:32:38Z-
dc.date.available2021-04-05T03:32:38Z-
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.issn22121099
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-84899816532
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.swu.ac.th/jspui/handle/123456789/13909-
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84899816532&doi=10.1016%2fj.vhri.2014.01.003&partnerID=40&md5=616d9b75a2bded55b007ae444a201144
dc.description.abstractObjectives: In Thailand, axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) is the dominant form of treatment for breast cancer, even though the treatment often leaves patients with some degree of arm morbidity. Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SNB) is widely accepted globally as a preferable alternative procedure because of its lower rates of associated morbidity. This study compared the cost-utility of SNB and ALND in patients with early stage breast cancer in Thailand. Methods: A decision tree with a 5-year time horizon was developed. Outcomes that were relevant to SNB and ALND were included, along with locoregional recurrence of cancer and lymphedema scenarios. The model parameters were derived from a meta-analysis of international clinical trials and other relevant literature. The resources and cost data were derived from the medical records of tertiary hospitals. Health utilities were measured by using the standard gamble technique. A sensitivity analysis was performed using a set of plausible parameters. Results: The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) in the base-case analysis showed that SNB was more cost-effective than ALND. ICERs were -275,140 and -470,600 Thailand baht/quality-adjusted life-year gained from the provider perspective and the societal perspective, respectively. The most sensitive parameter was the utility score of patients with early stage breast cancer who had received breast-conserving therapy with lymphedema; the sensitivity and specificity of SNB had no impact on the ICER. Conclusions: The study confirmed that SNB was an economically viable alternative treatment to ALND. In developing countries, where resources are limited, nationwide implementation of SNB warrants widespread support from relevant stakeholders, including medical personnel and policymakers. © 2014 International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR).
dc.subjectarticle
dc.subjectaxillary lymph node extirpation
dc.subjectbreast cancer
dc.subjectcancer recurrence
dc.subjectcancer staging
dc.subjectconservative treatment
dc.subjectcost effectiveness analysis
dc.subjectcost utility analysis
dc.subjectearly cancer
dc.subjecthealth care cost
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectintermethod comparison
dc.subjectlymph node dissection
dc.subjectlymphedema
dc.subjectmetastasis
dc.subjectprevalence
dc.subjectpriority journal
dc.subjectquality adjusted life year
dc.subjectscoring system
dc.subjectsensitivity analysis
dc.subjectsensitivity and specificity
dc.subjectsentinel lymph node biopsy
dc.subjectThailand
dc.titleA cost-utility analysis comparing standard axillary lymph node dissection with sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with early stage breast cancer in Thailand
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.holderScopus
dc.identifier.bibliograpycitationValue in Health Regional Issues. Vol 3, No.1 (2014), p.59-66
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.vhri.2014.01.003
Appears in Collections:Scopus 1983-2021

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in SWU repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.