Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ir.swu.ac.th/jspui/handle/123456789/13559
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Yingyongyudha A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Saengsirisuwan V. | |
dc.contributor.author | Panichaporn W. | |
dc.contributor.author | Boonsinsukh R. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-04-05T03:24:42Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-04-05T03:24:42Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 15398412 | |
dc.identifier.other | 2-s2.0-84962779396 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://ir.swu.ac.th/jspui/handle/123456789/13559 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84962779396&doi=10.1519%2fJPT.0000000000000050&partnerID=40&md5=3139070829608a648dd35252de10455c | |
dc.description.abstract | Background and Purpose: Balance deficits a significant predictor of falls in older adults. The Balance Evaluation Systems Test (BESTest) and the Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Mini-BESTest) are tools that may predict the likelihood of a fall, but their capabilities and accuracies have not been adequately addressed. Therefore, this study aimed at examining the capabilities of the BESTest and Mini-BESTest for identifying older adult with history of falls and comparing the participants with history of falls identification accuracy of the BESTest, Mini-BESTest, Berg Balance Scale (BBS), and the Timed Up and Go Test (TUG) for identifying participants with a history of falls. Methods: Two hundred healthy older adults with a mean age of 70 years were classified into participants with and without history of fall groups on the basis of their 12-month fall history. Their balance abilities were assessed using the BESTest, Mini-BESTest, BBS, and TUG. An analysis of the resulting receiver operating characteristic curves was performed to calculate the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, cutoff score, and posttest accuracy of each. Results: The Mini-BESTest showed the highest AUC (0.84) compared with the BESTest (0.74), BBS (0.69), and TUG (0.35), suggesting that the Mini-BESTest had the highest accuracy in identifying older adult with history of falls. At the cutoff score of 16 (out of 28), the Mini-BESTest demonstrated a posttest accuracy of 85% with a sensitivity of 85% and specificity of 75%. The Mini-BESTest had the highest posttest accuracy, with the others having results of 76% (BESTest), 60% (BBS), and 65% (TUG). Conclusion: The Mini-BESTest is the most accurate tool for identifying older adult with history of falls compared with the BESTest, BBS, and TUG. Copyright © 2016 The Academy of Geriatric Physical Therapy of the American Physical Therapy Association. | |
dc.subject | adult | |
dc.subject | aged | |
dc.subject | area under the curve | |
dc.subject | Berg Balance Scale | |
dc.subject | controlled study | |
dc.subject | diagnostic test accuracy study | |
dc.subject | human | |
dc.subject | major clinical study | |
dc.subject | receiver operating characteristic | |
dc.subject | body equilibrium | |
dc.subject | disability | |
dc.subject | falling | |
dc.subject | female | |
dc.subject | geriatric assessment | |
dc.subject | male | |
dc.subject | middle aged | |
dc.subject | physiotherapy | |
dc.subject | prevention and control | |
dc.subject | procedures | |
dc.subject | psychometry | |
dc.subject | reproducibility | |
dc.subject | very elderly | |
dc.subject | Accidental Falls | |
dc.subject | Aged | |
dc.subject | Aged, 80 and over | |
dc.subject | Disability Evaluation | |
dc.subject | Female | |
dc.subject | Geriatric Assessment | |
dc.subject | Humans | |
dc.subject | Male | |
dc.subject | Middle Aged | |
dc.subject | Physical Therapy Modalities | |
dc.subject | Postural Balance | |
dc.subject | Psychometrics | |
dc.subject | Reproducibility of Results | |
dc.subject | ROC Curve | |
dc.title | The Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Mini-BESTest) Demonstrates Higher Accuracy in Identifying Older Adult Participants with History of Falls Than Do the BESTest, Berg Balance Scale, or Timed Up and Go Test | |
dc.type | Article | |
dc.rights.holder | Scopus | |
dc.identifier.bibliograpycitation | Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy. Vol 39, No.2 (2016), p.64-70 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1519/JPT.0000000000000050 | |
Appears in Collections: | Scopus 1983-2021 |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in SWU repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.