Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ir.swu.ac.th/jspui/handle/123456789/13481
Title: Antimicrobial constituents and effects of blended eucalyptus, rosemary, patchouli, pine, and cajuput essential oils
Authors: Tadtong S.
Puengseangdee C.
Prasertthanawut S.
Hongratanaworakit T.
Keywords: 1 terpineol
1,4 cineole
2 methoxy 1,7,7 trimethyl bicyclo[2.2.1]heptane
3 carene
alpha campholenal
alpha fenchyl methylether
alpha phellandrene
alpha thujene
beta pinene
cajuput oil
camphene
camphene hydrate
camphor
chemical compound
cineole
essential oil
eucalyptus oil
limonene
linalool
mineral oil
myrcene
myrtanol
patchouli oil
pine oil
pinene
rosemary oil
terpinene
terpinolene
tricyclene
unclassified drug
unindexed drug
antifungal agent
antiinfective agent
vegetable oil
antibacterial activity
anticandidal activity
antimicrobial activity
Article
broth dilution
Candida albicans
chemical composition
controlled study
disk diffusion
Escherichia coli
mass fragmentography
minimum inhibitory concentration
nonhuman
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Staphylococcus aureus
Staphylococcus epidermidis
bacterium
chemistry
classification
drug effects
plant
Anti-Bacterial Agents
Antifungal Agents
Bacteria
Candida albicans
Plant Oils
Plants
Issue Date: 2016
Abstract: The synergistic antimicrobial activities of blended essential oil preparations composed of eucalyptus, rosemary, patchouli, pine and cajuput oils were evaluated against various pathogenic microorganisms. They exhibited antimicrobial activity in the agar disc diffusion assay against the Gram-positive bacteria, Staphylococcus aureus and S. epidermidis, the Gram-negative bacteria, Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and the yeast, Candida albicans. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of these preparations was evaluated by the broth microdilution method. We found that the best synergistic antibacterial preparation (the sum of fractional inhibitory concentrations, Σfic< 1) was eucalyptus, rosemary, and mineral oils (volume ratio 4:4:2) without patchouli, pine or cajuput oils added, while most preparations showed an antagonistic anticandidal effect (Σfic> 1). The blended essential oil preparations were characterized for their components by GC/MS, and contained 1,8-cineole as a major component. However, the preparation containing the highest amount of 1,8-cineole did not exhibit the best synergistic effect, which was shown by the preparation comprising the highest amount of α-pinene. Hence, we concluded that the differential antibacterial effect of either blended oil preparations or single/pure essential oils was influenced by the amount of α-pinene and the number of active components in either the blended preparations or single/pure essential oils.
URI: https://ir.swu.ac.th/jspui/handle/123456789/13481
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84973409820&doi=10.1177%2f1934578x1601100234&partnerID=40&md5=3124de73689a7af096999f2292da44cb
ISSN: 1934578X
Appears in Collections:Scopus 1983-2021

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in SWU repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.