Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ir.swu.ac.th/jspui/handle/123456789/13481
Title: | Antimicrobial constituents and effects of blended eucalyptus, rosemary, patchouli, pine, and cajuput essential oils |
Authors: | Tadtong S. Puengseangdee C. Prasertthanawut S. Hongratanaworakit T. |
Keywords: | 1 terpineol 1,4 cineole 2 methoxy 1,7,7 trimethyl bicyclo[2.2.1]heptane 3 carene alpha campholenal alpha fenchyl methylether alpha phellandrene alpha thujene beta pinene cajuput oil camphene camphene hydrate camphor chemical compound cineole essential oil eucalyptus oil limonene linalool mineral oil myrcene myrtanol patchouli oil pine oil pinene rosemary oil terpinene terpinolene tricyclene unclassified drug unindexed drug antifungal agent antiinfective agent vegetable oil antibacterial activity anticandidal activity antimicrobial activity Article broth dilution Candida albicans chemical composition controlled study disk diffusion Escherichia coli mass fragmentography minimum inhibitory concentration nonhuman Pseudomonas aeruginosa Staphylococcus aureus Staphylococcus epidermidis bacterium chemistry classification drug effects plant Anti-Bacterial Agents Antifungal Agents Bacteria Candida albicans Plant Oils Plants |
Issue Date: | 2016 |
Abstract: | The synergistic antimicrobial activities of blended essential oil preparations composed of eucalyptus, rosemary, patchouli, pine and cajuput oils were evaluated against various pathogenic microorganisms. They exhibited antimicrobial activity in the agar disc diffusion assay against the Gram-positive bacteria, Staphylococcus aureus and S. epidermidis, the Gram-negative bacteria, Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and the yeast, Candida albicans. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of these preparations was evaluated by the broth microdilution method. We found that the best synergistic antibacterial preparation (the sum of fractional inhibitory concentrations, Σfic< 1) was eucalyptus, rosemary, and mineral oils (volume ratio 4:4:2) without patchouli, pine or cajuput oils added, while most preparations showed an antagonistic anticandidal effect (Σfic> 1). The blended essential oil preparations were characterized for their components by GC/MS, and contained 1,8-cineole as a major component. However, the preparation containing the highest amount of 1,8-cineole did not exhibit the best synergistic effect, which was shown by the preparation comprising the highest amount of α-pinene. Hence, we concluded that the differential antibacterial effect of either blended oil preparations or single/pure essential oils was influenced by the amount of α-pinene and the number of active components in either the blended preparations or single/pure essential oils. |
URI: | https://ir.swu.ac.th/jspui/handle/123456789/13481 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84973409820&doi=10.1177%2f1934578x1601100234&partnerID=40&md5=3124de73689a7af096999f2292da44cb |
ISSN: | 1934578X |
Appears in Collections: | Scopus 1983-2021 |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in SWU repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.