Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ir.swu.ac.th/jspui/handle/123456789/13449
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPoulter J.
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-05T03:24:00Z-
dc.date.available2021-04-05T03:24:00Z-
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.issn24700045
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-84963681276
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.swu.ac.th/jspui/handle/123456789/13449-
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84963681276&doi=10.1103%2fPhysRevE.93.032149&partnerID=40&md5=5dccbe416ce538cbcda5d62c0918f0bb
dc.description.abstractThis pedagogical comment highlights three misconceptions concerning the usefulness of the concept of negative temperature, being derived from the usual, often termed Boltzmann, definition of entropy. First, both the Boltzmann and Gibbs entropies must obey the same thermodynamic consistency relation. Second, the Boltzmann entropy does obey the second law of thermodynamics. Third, there exists an integrating factor of the heat differential with both definitions of entropy. © 2016 American Physical Society.
dc.subjectLasers
dc.subjectMasers
dc.subjectTemperature
dc.subjectThermodynamics
dc.subjectBoltzmann
dc.subjectBoltzmann entropy
dc.subjectGibbs entropy
dc.subjectIntegrating factor
dc.subjectNegative temperatures
dc.subjectSecond Law of Thermodynamics
dc.subjectThermodynamic consistency
dc.subjectEntropy
dc.titleIn defense of negative temperature
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.holderScopus
dc.identifier.bibliograpycitationPhysical Review E. Vol 93, No.3 (2016)
dc.identifier.doi10.1103/PhysRevE.93.032149
Appears in Collections:Scopus 1983-2021

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in SWU repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.