Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ir.swu.ac.th/jspui/handle/123456789/13415
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWanachantararak S.
dc.contributor.authorAjcharanukul O.
dc.contributor.authorVongsavan N.
dc.contributor.authorMatthews B.
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-05T03:23:50Z-
dc.date.available2021-04-05T03:23:50Z-
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.issn39969
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-84959513991
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.swu.ac.th/jspui/handle/123456789/13415-
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84959513991&doi=10.1016%2fj.archoralbio.2016.02.015&partnerID=40&md5=65daa9218d2ab6dccd2db898bfb230ae
dc.description.abstractObjective To determine if dentine at the enamel-dentine junction (EDJ) in man is more sensitive to hydrostatic pressure stimuli then deeper dentine. Design Cavities (1 mm diam.) were cut at the tips of the buccal and lingual cusps of 8 premolars in 3 subjects (ages: 22-25 years). Both cavities were initially deepened to expose the EDJ then one (the test cavity) was deepened in steps of 0.5 mm to a maximum of 2.0 mm below the EDJ. The cavities were tested at each stage, before and after etching, with 5 s, hydrostatic pressure stimuli between 400 mm above, and 400 mm below atmospheric. The intensity of any pain produced was recorded on a VAS scale and electrodes were placed in both cavities in an attempt to monitor any action potentials evoked in intradental nerves. Results In all the teeth, the intensity of the pain produced by a stimulus tended to increase as the cavity was deepened, as did the number of action potentials recorded (in 6 of the 8 teeth). The responses were greater from etched than unetched dentine, and negative pressures evoked greater responses than the corresponding positive pressures. Conclusion There was no evidence that dentine close to the EDJ was more sensitive to hydrostatic pressure stimuli than deeper dentine. It may however be more sensitive to mechanical stimuli as it is more compliant. © 2016 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
dc.subjectadult
dc.subjectadverse effects
dc.subjectanatomy and histology
dc.subjectatmospheric pressure
dc.subjectchemically induced
dc.subjectcomparative study
dc.subjectdental acid etching
dc.subjectdental etching
dc.subjectdental surgery
dc.subjectdentin
dc.subjectdentin sensitivity
dc.subjectenamel
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjecthydrostatic pressure
dc.subjectmale
dc.subjectpain
dc.subjectpain threshold
dc.subjectpathophysiology
dc.subjectphysiology
dc.subjectpremolar tooth
dc.subjecttooth crown
dc.subjectAcid Etching, Dental
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectAtmospheric Pressure
dc.subjectBicuspid
dc.subjectDental Cavity Preparation
dc.subjectDental Enamel
dc.subjectDental Etching
dc.subjectDentin
dc.subjectDentin Sensitivity
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectHydrostatic Pressure
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectPain
dc.subjectPain Threshold
dc.subjectTooth Crown
dc.titleEffect of cavity depth on dentine sensitivity in man
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.holderScopus
dc.identifier.bibliograpycitationArchives of Oral Biology. Vol 66, (2016), p.120-128
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.archoralbio.2016.02.015
Appears in Collections:Scopus 1983-2021

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in SWU repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.