Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ir.swu.ac.th/jspui/handle/123456789/13239
Title: A model for predicting outcome following surgical clipping in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage
Authors: Srikaew S.
Kaewpradit A.
Kongkasem K.
Songtish D.
Keywords: adult
aneurysm clipping
anterior cerebral artery
anterior communicating artery aneurysm
Article
brain artery aneurysm
case control study
controlled study
diagnostic accuracy
female
Glasgow coma scale
human
internal carotid artery aneurysm
male
middle aged
Modified Fisher grading scale
mortality
posterior communicating artery
posterior inferior cerebellar artery
predictive value
receiver operating characteristic
risk assessment
sample size
sensitivity and specificity
subarachnoid hemorrhage
treatment outcome
World Federation of Neurosurgeons Scale
Issue Date: 2017
Abstract: Background: Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage is one of the most serious neurosurgical conditions. There are a few studies in Thai population. Objective: To investigate factors related to poor outcome after cerebral aneurysms clipping and establish a risk score model to predict unfavorable outcome. Material and Method: A nested case-control study was conducted from cohort data between January 2010 to December 2016 at Her Royal Highness Princess Maha Chakri Sirindhorn Medical Center and Saraburi Hospital. One hundred and sixty-eight aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage patients were enrolled in the study. Surgical outcome was assessed by Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS). The number of the case per control was 1: 1. Factors associated with unfavorable outcome were analyzed. A risk score model was developed by backward stepwise binary logistic regression analysis, and the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve was constructed. Results: Factors associated with poor outcome were the Modified Fisher grading scale of grade 3 or 4 (OR 17.8; 95% CI 6.8 to 46.7), the best motor response of Glasgow Coma Scale M4 or M5 (OR 8.1; 95% CI 3.2 to 20.4), and age of patients over than 60 years (OR 3.2; 95% CI 1.2 to 8.4). The final risk score model = 1 (age over than 60) +2.5 (GCS M4 or M5) +5.5 (Modified Fisher grading scale 3 or 4). The corresponding ROC for the accuracy of predicting the unfavorable outcome was 0.91; 95% CI 0.86 to 0.95 (p<0.001). Conclusion: The simple risk score model based on three independent factors (Modified Fisher grading scale of grade 3 or 4, the best motor response of GCS being M4 or M5, and the age of the patients >60 years) was created to predict unfavorable outcome. © 2017 Medical Association of Thailand. All rights reserved.
URI: https://ir.swu.ac.th/jspui/handle/123456789/13239
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85075012678&partnerID=40&md5=b25e2618516f7e1973a83c7855a281b9
ISSN: 1252208
Appears in Collections:Scopus 1983-2021

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in SWU repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.