Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ir.swu.ac.th/jspui/handle/123456789/13125
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorOsataphan S.
dc.contributor.authorChalermchai T.
dc.contributor.authorNgaosuwan K.
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-05T03:22:23Z-
dc.date.available2021-04-05T03:22:23Z-
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.issn17530393
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-84979238875
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.swu.ac.th/jspui/handle/123456789/13125-
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84979238875&doi=10.1111%2f1753-0407.12410&partnerID=40&md5=db99f627d8590b021ef2feca62926d0f
dc.description.abstractBackground: Clinical inertia is a failure to intensify treatment according to evidence-based guidelines, and can have both short- and long-term adverse effects for type 2 diabetes (T2D). The aim of the present study was to demonstrate the effects of clinical inertia on glycemic control and diabetes-related complications. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a university-based hospital in Thailand. Medical records were evaluated retrospectively from January 2010 to December 2014. Patients were classified into two groups: clinical inertia and non-inertia. Clinical inertia was defined as failure to initiate insulin within 3 months in patients with HbA1c ≥9 % who were already taking two oral antidiabetic agents. Results: From 1206 records, 98 patients with mean HbA1c of 10.3 % were identified and enrolled in the study. The median follow-up time of these patients was 29.5 months and 68.4 % were classified into the clinical inertia group. The mean (± SD) HbA1c decrement in the clinical inertia and non-inertia groups was 0.82 ± 1.50 % and 3.02 ± 1.80 %, respectively, at 6 months (P < 0.001) and 1.46 ± 1.85 % and 3.04 ± 1.76 %, respectively, at the end of study (P < 0.001). Clinical inertia was associated with a significantly shorter median time to progression of diabetic retinopathy (DR); log rank test, P = 0.02 and a higher incidence of DR progression (10 vs 2.2 cases per 1000 person-months; P = 0.003). The adjusted incidence rate ratio for DR progression in the clinical inertia group was 4.92 (95 % confidence interval 1.11–21.77; P = 0.036). Being treated by general practitioners was the strongest risk factor associated with clinical inertia. Conclusions: Clinical inertia can cause persistently poor glycemic control and speed up the progression of DR in T2D. © 2016 Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
dc.subjectalpha glucosidase inhibitor
dc.subjectdipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor
dc.subjectglitazone derivative
dc.subjecthemoglobin A1c
dc.subjectinsulin
dc.subjectmetformin
dc.subjectoral antidiabetic agent
dc.subjectsulfonylurea
dc.subjectantidiabetic agent
dc.subjectglycosylated hemoglobin
dc.subjectinsulin
dc.subjectadult
dc.subjectaged
dc.subjectArticle
dc.subjectcohort analysis
dc.subjectcontrolled study
dc.subjectdiabetic retinopathy
dc.subjectdisease course
dc.subjectfemale
dc.subjectfollow up
dc.subjectgeneral practitioner
dc.subjectglycemic control
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectincidence
dc.subjectmajor clinical study
dc.subjectmale
dc.subjectnon insulin dependent diabetes mellitus
dc.subjectretrospective study
dc.subjectrisk factor
dc.subjectThailand
dc.subjectblood
dc.subjectcomplication
dc.subjectDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2
dc.subjectdiabetic retinopathy
dc.subjectmetabolism
dc.subjectmiddle aged
dc.subjectstatistical model
dc.subjecttime factor
dc.subjectuniversity hospital
dc.subjectvery elderly
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectAged
dc.subjectAged, 80 and over
dc.subjectDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2
dc.subjectDiabetic Retinopathy
dc.subjectDisease Progression
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectHemoglobin A, Glycosylated
dc.subjectHospitals, University
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectHypoglycemic Agents
dc.subjectInsulin
dc.subjectLogistic Models
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectMiddle Aged
dc.subjectRetrospective Studies
dc.subjectRisk Factors
dc.subjectThailand
dc.subjectTime Factors
dc.titleClinical inertia causing new or progression of diabetic retinopathy in type 2 diabetes: A retrospective cohort study
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.holderScopus
dc.identifier.bibliograpycitationJournal of Diabetes. Vol 9, No.3 (2017), p.267-274
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/1753-0407.12410
Appears in Collections:Scopus 1983-2021

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in SWU repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.