Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ir.swu.ac.th/jspui/handle/123456789/13125
Title: | Clinical inertia causing new or progression of diabetic retinopathy in type 2 diabetes: A retrospective cohort study |
Authors: | Osataphan S. Chalermchai T. Ngaosuwan K. |
Keywords: | alpha glucosidase inhibitor dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor glitazone derivative hemoglobin A1c insulin metformin oral antidiabetic agent sulfonylurea antidiabetic agent glycosylated hemoglobin insulin adult aged Article cohort analysis controlled study diabetic retinopathy disease course female follow up general practitioner glycemic control human incidence major clinical study male non insulin dependent diabetes mellitus retrospective study risk factor Thailand blood complication Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 diabetic retinopathy metabolism middle aged statistical model time factor university hospital very elderly Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 Diabetic Retinopathy Disease Progression Female Hemoglobin A, Glycosylated Hospitals, University Humans Hypoglycemic Agents Insulin Logistic Models Male Middle Aged Retrospective Studies Risk Factors Thailand Time Factors |
Issue Date: | 2017 |
Abstract: | Background: Clinical inertia is a failure to intensify treatment according to evidence-based guidelines, and can have both short- and long-term adverse effects for type 2 diabetes (T2D). The aim of the present study was to demonstrate the effects of clinical inertia on glycemic control and diabetes-related complications. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a university-based hospital in Thailand. Medical records were evaluated retrospectively from January 2010 to December 2014. Patients were classified into two groups: clinical inertia and non-inertia. Clinical inertia was defined as failure to initiate insulin within 3 months in patients with HbA1c ≥9 % who were already taking two oral antidiabetic agents. Results: From 1206 records, 98 patients with mean HbA1c of 10.3 % were identified and enrolled in the study. The median follow-up time of these patients was 29.5 months and 68.4 % were classified into the clinical inertia group. The mean (± SD) HbA1c decrement in the clinical inertia and non-inertia groups was 0.82 ± 1.50 % and 3.02 ± 1.80 %, respectively, at 6 months (P < 0.001) and 1.46 ± 1.85 % and 3.04 ± 1.76 %, respectively, at the end of study (P < 0.001). Clinical inertia was associated with a significantly shorter median time to progression of diabetic retinopathy (DR); log rank test, P = 0.02 and a higher incidence of DR progression (10 vs 2.2 cases per 1000 person-months; P = 0.003). The adjusted incidence rate ratio for DR progression in the clinical inertia group was 4.92 (95 % confidence interval 1.11–21.77; P = 0.036). Being treated by general practitioners was the strongest risk factor associated with clinical inertia. Conclusions: Clinical inertia can cause persistently poor glycemic control and speed up the progression of DR in T2D. © 2016 Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd |
URI: | https://ir.swu.ac.th/jspui/handle/123456789/13125 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84979238875&doi=10.1111%2f1753-0407.12410&partnerID=40&md5=db99f627d8590b021ef2feca62926d0f |
ISSN: | 17530393 |
Appears in Collections: | Scopus 1983-2021 |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in SWU repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.