Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ir.swu.ac.th/jspui/handle/123456789/12794
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChatrattanawet N.
dc.contributor.authorSaebea D.
dc.contributor.authorAuthayanun S.
dc.contributor.authorArpornwichanop A.
dc.contributor.authorPatcharavorachot Y.
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-05T03:21:37Z-
dc.date.available2021-04-05T03:21:37Z-
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.issn3605442
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85021350626
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.swu.ac.th/jspui/handle/123456789/12794-
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85021350626&doi=10.1016%2fj.energy.2017.06.125&partnerID=40&md5=1c537c9be4eaf3711457de24b13980b1
dc.description.abstractIn this work, solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs) using biogas as the fuel with two different reforming approaches, i.e., external and internal reforming, were studied to determine the optimal operation conditions for each approach. Thermodynamic analysis was performed using a flowsheet simulator. The equilibrium gas composition was calculated by minimizing the Gibbs free energy. An electrochemical model that includes three voltage losses (i.e., activation, ohmic, and concentration losses) was used to predict the performance of the SOFCs. The simulation results showed that the reformer in the external reforming SOFC should be operated at a temperature of 973 K, a pressure of 1 atm, and a steam-to-carbon molar ratio of 0.5. In performance analysis, the simulation results indicated that both approaches have the same optimal operating conditions, i.e. a temperature of 1173 K, a pressure of 3 atm, and a current density of 5000 A/m2. Under the same operating conditions, the internal reforming SOFC exhibited better electrical efficiency than that of the external reforming SOFC. Considering the CO2 and CO emissions, the exhaust gas obtained from the anode side of the internal reforming SOFC contained 7.4% CO2 and 37.9% CO, which are higher values than those for the external reforming SOFC (1.9% CO2 and 32.5% CO). © 2017 Elsevier Ltd
dc.subjectBiogas
dc.subjectCarbon
dc.subjectCarbon dioxide
dc.subjectExhaust gases
dc.subjectFuel cells
dc.subjectGas emissions
dc.subjectReforming reactions
dc.subjectSteam reforming
dc.subjectThermoanalysis
dc.subjectThermodynamic properties
dc.subjectElectrical efficiency
dc.subjectElectrochemical modeling
dc.subjectEnvironmental studies
dc.subjectInternal reforming sofc
dc.subjectOptimal operating conditions
dc.subjectOptimal operation conditions
dc.subjectSolid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs)
dc.subjectThermo dynamic analysis
dc.subjectSolid oxide fuel cells (SOFC)
dc.subjectbiogas
dc.subjectelectrochemical method
dc.subjectenergy efficiency
dc.subjectfuel cell
dc.subjectGibbs free energy
dc.subjectoperations technology
dc.subjectperformance assessment
dc.subjectsolid
dc.subjectthermodynamics
dc.titlePerformance and environmental study of a biogas-fuelled solid oxide fuel cell with different reforming approaches
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.holderScopus
dc.identifier.bibliograpycitationEnergy. Vol 146, (2018), p.131-140
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.energy.2017.06.125
Appears in Collections:Scopus 1983-2021

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in SWU repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.