Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ir.swu.ac.th/jspui/handle/123456789/12714
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMasankaran L.
dc.contributor.authorViyanon W.
dc.contributor.authorMahasittiwat V.
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-05T03:05:12Z-
dc.date.available2021-04-05T03:05:12Z-
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85060005138
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.swu.ac.th/jspui/handle/123456789/12714-
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85060005138&doi=10.1109%2fICIIBMS.2018.8550002&partnerID=40&md5=12ab0f3d2e70e713f8457e226ab6c084
dc.description.abstractBenign Paroxysmal Positioning Vertigo (BPPV) is one of the causes of vertigo which extremely affects the daily life of patients. Different types of BPPV are treated in a different way. Physicians differentiate the BPPV types using nystagmus characteristics. However, some patients have unclear nystagmus, so their treatments are delayed due to the difficulty of diagnosis. Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) is a tool to assess the severity of dizziness before a patient is diagnosed by a physician. The use of DHI can distinguish BPPV types which can help physicians decide what treatments would be suitable for patients. This research aims to study the ability of using DHI for diferrential diagnosis of Posterior canal-Benign Paroxysmal Positioning Vertigo (PC-BPPV) and Horizontal canal-Benign Paroxysmal Positioning Vertigo (HC-BPPV) via machine learning techniques. We used feature selection techniques and feature engineering to increase the power of machine learning algorithms. Random Forest, Support vector machine, K-Nearest Neighbor and Naïve Bayes were used to develop predictive models from DHI features that have statistically significant. Accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score were used to evaluate the performance of each model. It reveals that F7+E23, age and P8 are the top three important features and the model using Gaussian Naïve Bayes is the best model to discriminate HC-BPPV and PC-BPPV with 73.91% accuracy, 66.67% precision, 80.00% recall and 72.73% F1-score. In conclusion, the models that were created from DHI score can predict BPPV types at a certain level, but still not very good. Physicians have to use patient°s medical history and nystagmus observation for diagnosis. In the future, if we can collect more data or features, we may reduce the overfitting problem and have a better performance model. © 2018 IEEE.
dc.subjectArtificial intelligence
dc.subjectDecision trees
dc.subjectDiagnosis
dc.subjectHydraulic structures
dc.subjectLearning systems
dc.subjectNearest neighbor search
dc.subjectOccupational diseases
dc.subjectBPPV
dc.subjectFeature engineerings
dc.subjectFeature selection techniques
dc.subjectHC-BPPV
dc.subjectK-nearest neighbors
dc.subjectMachine learning techniques
dc.subjectOver fitting problem
dc.subjectvertigo
dc.subjectLearning algorithms
dc.titleClassification of Benign Paroxysmal Positioning Vertigo Types from Dizziness Handicap Inventory using Machine Learning Techniques
dc.typeConference Paper
dc.rights.holderScopus
dc.identifier.bibliograpycitation2018 International Conference on Intelligent Informatics and Biomedical Sciences, ICIIBMS 2018. (2018), p.209-214
dc.identifier.doi10.1109/ICIIBMS.2018.8550002
Appears in Collections:Scopus 1983-2021

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in SWU repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.