Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ir.swu.ac.th/jspui/handle/123456789/12599
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTangkiatkumjai M.
dc.contributor.authorBoardman H.
dc.contributor.authorWalker D.-M.
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-05T03:04:22Z-
dc.date.available2021-04-05T03:04:22Z-
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.issn26627671
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85096413440
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.swu.ac.th/jspui/handle/123456789/12599-
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85096413440&doi=10.1186%2fs12906-020-03157-2&partnerID=40&md5=970d88c016f367574fe040f745acf56f
dc.description.abstractObjectives: To determine similarities and differences in the reasons for using or not using complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) amongst general and condition-specific populations, and amongst populations in each region of the globe. Methods: A literature search was performed on Pubmed, ScienceDirect and EMBASE. Keywords: ‘herbal medicine’ OR ‘herbal and dietary supplement’ OR ‘complementary and alternative medicine’ AND ‘reason’ OR ‘attitude’. Quantitative or qualitative original articles in English, published between 2003 and 2018 were reviewed. Conference proceedings, pilot studies, protocols, letters, and reviews were excluded. Papers were appraised using valid tools and a ‘risk of bias’ assessment was also performed. Thematic analysis was conducted. Reasons were coded in each paper, then codes were grouped into categories. If several categories reported similar reasons, these were combined into a theme. Themes were then analysed using χ2 tests to identify the main factors related to reasons for CAM usage. Results: 231 publications were included. Reasons for CAM use amongst general and condition-specific populations were similar. The top three reasons for CAM use were: (1) having an expectation of benefits of CAM (84% of publications), (2) dissatisfaction with conventional medicine (37%) and (3) the perceived safety of CAM (37%). Internal health locus of control as an influencing factor was more likely to be reported in Western populations, whereas the social networks was a common factor amongst Asian populations (p < 0.05). Affordability, easy access to CAM and tradition were significant factors amongst African populations (p < 0.05). Negative attitudes towards CAM and satisfaction with conventional medicine (CM) were the main reasons for non-use (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Dissatisfaction with CM and positive attitudes toward CAM, motivate people to use CAM. In contrast, satisfaction with CM and negative attitudes towards CAM are the main reasons for non-use. © 2020, The Author(s).
dc.rightsSrinakharinwirot University
dc.subjectAfrican
dc.subjectallopathy
dc.subjectalternative medicine
dc.subjectarticle
dc.subjectAsian
dc.subjectattitude
dc.subjectdietary supplement
dc.subjectEmbase
dc.subjectexpectation
dc.subjectherbal medicine
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectlocus of control
dc.subjectMedline
dc.subjectpilot study
dc.subjectrisk assessment
dc.subjectsatisfaction
dc.subjectScienceDirect
dc.subjectsocial network
dc.subjectsystematic review
dc.subjectthematic analysis
dc.titlePotential factors that influence usage of complementary and alternative medicine worldwide: a systematic review
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.holderScopus
dc.identifier.bibliograpycitationBMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies. Vol 20, No.1 (2020)
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12906-020-03157-2
Appears in Collections:Scopus 1983-2021

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in SWU repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.