Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ir.swu.ac.th/jspui/handle/123456789/12485
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWahab M.S.A.
dc.contributor.authorSakthong P.
dc.contributor.authorWinit-Watjana W.
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-05T03:03:39Z-
dc.date.available2021-04-05T03:03:39Z-
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn17598885
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85061324288
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.swu.ac.th/jspui/handle/123456789/12485-
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85061324288&doi=10.1111%2fjphs.12238&partnerID=40&md5=f48eecfe2054c5a4e6ecf567c9b3f44f
dc.description.abstractObjectives: Herbal and dietary supplements (HDS) can cause adverse effects or interact with diseases and medications. Community pharmacists have a role in ensuring the safe use of HDS, but they have been reported to not being proactive in providing pharmacist care (PCare) for HDS users. The reasons for this warranted investigation. The study aimed to explore pharmacists’ understanding of PCare for HDS users, and to investigate the underlying beliefs or factors influencing its provision by community pharmacists, guided by the theory of planned behaviour. Methods: A qualitative study using a semi-structured interview guide was conducted in a purposive sample of community pharmacists working in Bangkok, Thailand, from December 2016 to June 2017. All interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and analysed using qualitative content analysis. Key findings: Twenty-two pharmacists were interviewed. Several professional pharmacy activities were regarded as PCare for HDS users. The pharmacists reported that the provision of such care was advantageous in terms of promoting rational use of HDS, ensuring safety of users, enhancing own knowledge and promote customers’ loyalty. Facilitators for PCare included the initiation of conversation about HDS by the users, professional training and the availability of reference materials. The reluctance of HDS users to accept pharmacists’ opinions, insufficient education in HDS and limited sources of information were identified as barriers. Most pharmacists believed that PCare for HDS users is part of their responsibilities. Conclusions: The pharmacists expressed their views on the meaning of PCare for HDS users, and described the beliefs and factors that facilitate or impede its provision. Information from this study can be used to inform strategies that can promote pharmacists to become more proactive in providing PCare for HDS users. © 2018 Royal Pharmaceutical Society
dc.subjectherbaceous agent
dc.subjectadult
dc.subjectArticle
dc.subjectcommunity pharmacist
dc.subjectcontent analysis
dc.subjectdecision making
dc.subjectfemale
dc.subjectfood
dc.subjecthealth belief
dc.subjectherbal and dietary supplement
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectjob experience
dc.subjectknowledge
dc.subjectmale
dc.subjectmedical care
dc.subjectpharmacist attitude
dc.subjectpharmacist care
dc.subjectpriority journal
dc.subjectproduct safety
dc.subjectpurposive sample
dc.subjectqualitative research
dc.subjectsemi structured interview
dc.subjectThailand
dc.subjectTheory of Planned Behavior
dc.subjecttraining
dc.titleQualitative exploration of pharmacist care for herbal and dietary supplement users in Thai community pharmacies
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.holderScopus
dc.identifier.bibliograpycitationJournal of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research. Vol 10, No.1 (2019), p.57-66
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jphs.12238
Appears in Collections:Scopus 1983-2021

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in SWU repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.