Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ir.swu.ac.th/jspui/handle/123456789/12419
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTreesirichod A.
dc.contributor.authorChaithirayanon S.
dc.contributor.authorWongjitrat N.
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-05T03:03:16Z-
dc.date.available2021-04-05T03:03:16Z-
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn7368046
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85065863410
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.swu.ac.th/jspui/handle/123456789/12419-
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85065863410&doi=10.1111%2fpde.13799&partnerID=40&md5=9e68ab3bbdc165548b7b203fc4a66626
dc.description.abstractBackground: There have been few published randomized controlled trials for the treatment of childhood acanthosis nigricans (AN) to date. Objective: To assess the efficacy of topical 0.1% adapalene gel compared to 0.025% tretinoin cream in the treatment of childhood AN. Methods: An 8-week, randomized, split-neck, comparative study between topical 0.1% adapalene gel and 0.025% tretinoin cream for the treatment of neck hyperpigmentation associated with AN was performed. M index measured by a narrowband reflectance spectrophotometer and both investigator's global evaluation (IGE) and parent's global evaluation (PGE) scales were used to evaluate efficacy. Results: There was no statistically significant difference between 0.1% adapalene gel and 0.025% tretinoin cream in the treatment of AN-associated hyperpigmentation (P = 0.56). Mean differences in M indices between week 0 and week 8 of 0.1% adapalene and 0.025% tretinoin treatment were 24.2 ± 7.9% and 23.8 ± 8.3% improvement, respectively. Regarding treatment efficacy, 90.0% and 85.0% of participants had more than 75% improvement in IGE in 0.1% adapalene and 0.025% tretinoin treatment sides, respectively. In addition, 75.0% and 65.0% of participants had more than 75.0% improvement in PGE in 0.1% adapalene and 0.025% tretinoin treatment sides, respectively. Limitations: Lack of histopathological evaluations. Conclusions: We found no significant difference between topical 0.1% adapalene gel and 0.025% tretinoin in the treatment of AN. © 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.subjectadapalene
dc.subjectretinoic acid
dc.subjectadapalene
dc.subjectdermatological agent
dc.subjectkeratolytic agent
dc.subjectretinoic acid
dc.subjectskin cream
dc.subjectacanthosis nigricans
dc.subjectadolescent
dc.subjectArticle
dc.subjectbody weight change
dc.subjectchild safety
dc.subjectclinical article
dc.subjectcontrolled study
dc.subjectdouble blind procedure
dc.subjectdrug efficacy
dc.subjectdrug safety
dc.subjectfemale
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjecthyperpigmentation
dc.subjectmale
dc.subjectoutcome assessment
dc.subjectpriority journal
dc.subjectrandomized controlled trial
dc.subjectacanthosis nigricans
dc.subjectchild
dc.subjectcomparative study
dc.subjectcutaneous drug administration
dc.subjectgel
dc.subjectneck
dc.subjecttreatment outcome
dc.subjectAcanthosis Nigricans
dc.subjectAdapalene
dc.subjectAdministration, Cutaneous
dc.subjectAdolescent
dc.subjectChild
dc.subjectDermatologic Agents
dc.subjectDouble-Blind Method
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectGels
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectKeratolytic Agents
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectNeck
dc.subjectSkin Cream
dc.subjectTreatment Outcome
dc.subjectTretinoin
dc.titleComparison of the efficacy and safety of 0.1% adapalene gel and 0.025% tretinoin cream in the treatment of childhood acanthosis nigricans
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.holderScopus
dc.identifier.bibliograpycitationPediatric Dermatology. Vol 36, No.3 (2019), p.330-334
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/pde.13799
Appears in Collections:Scopus 1983-2021

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in SWU repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.