Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ir.swu.ac.th/jspui/handle/123456789/12377
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBoonsinsukh R.
dc.contributor.authorKhumnonchai B.
dc.contributor.authorSaengsirisuwan V.
dc.contributor.authorChaikeeree N.
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-05T03:03:05Z-
dc.date.available2021-04-05T03:03:05Z-
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.issn10137025
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85091949713
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.swu.ac.th/jspui/handle/123456789/12377-
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85091949713&doi=10.1142%2fS1013702520500134&partnerID=40&md5=e2272f023f082e5869107dd9eaf6d00b
dc.description.abstractBackground: The type of foam pad used in the modified Clinical Test of Sensory Interaction and Balance (mCTSIB) influences the accuracy with which elderly fallers are identified. Two types of foam are commonly used in practice: Airex and Neurocom foam. Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy with which elderly fallers can be identified when the Airex foam and Neurocom foam are used in the mCTSIB. Methods: One hundred eighty-four elderly participants with a mean age of 69 years were classified into faller and nonfaller groups based on their 12-month fall history. Balance stability was measured under four conditions of the mCTSIB for 120 s each: standing on a floor or a foam pad with their eyes open or eyes closed. The time needed to maintain stability was measured by a stopwatch, and postural sway characteristics were measured using an acceleration-based system. Comparisons between groups were performed by two-way mixed ANOVA. The accuracy of differentiating elderly fallers from nonfallers with different foam types was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis. The time to maintain stability under four conditions of the mCTSIB (composite score) and under two conditions on the foam (foam score) were used for the ROC analysis. Results: The results showed that the nonfallers required more time to maintain stability and had a smaller sway area than the fallers (p<0.001). The foam led to a larger difference between groups, suggesting the use of foam in examining the risk of falls. The Airex and the Neurocom foam pads led to a large area under the curve (0.93 to 0.95) in identifying elderly fallers and nonfallers when the composite and foam scores were used. A cutoff score of 447/480 s for the composite score and 223/240 s for the foam score yielded a posttest accuracy of 88% to 89%, with a sensitivity of 0.80-0.92 and specificity of 0.88-0.95. Conclusion: In conclusion, Airex and Neurocom foam can be used interchangeably with guidance in the mCTSIB, as they led to the accurate identification of elderly fallers among older persons who could walk and live independently in the community. © 2020 Hong Kong Physiotherapy Association.
dc.rightsSrinakharinwirot University
dc.subjectaccuracy
dc.subjectaged
dc.subjectArticle
dc.subjectassessment of humans
dc.subjectfalling
dc.subjectfemale
dc.subjectfoam
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectmajor clinical study
dc.subjectmale
dc.subjectmodified clinical test of sensory interaction and balance
dc.subjectobservational study
dc.subjectsensitivity and specificity
dc.subjectstanding
dc.titleThe effect of the type of foam pad used in the modified Clinical Test of Sensory Interaction and Balance (mCTSIB) on the accuracy in identifying older adults with fall history
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.holderScopus
dc.identifier.bibliograpycitationHong Kong Physiotherapy Journal. Vol 40, No.2 (2020), p.133-143
dc.identifier.doi10.1142/S1013702520500134
Appears in Collections:Scopus 1983-2021

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in SWU repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.