Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ir.swu.ac.th/jspui/handle/123456789/12106
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Chanthahong S. | |
dc.contributor.author | Prueksasit T. | |
dc.contributor.author | Sahanavin N. | |
dc.contributor.author | Kanjanasiranont N. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-04-05T03:01:56Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-04-05T03:01:56Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 18635520 | |
dc.identifier.other | 2-s2.0-85087004495 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://ir.swu.ac.th/jspui/handle/123456789/12106 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85087004495&doi=10.1007%2f978-3-030-45263-6_33&partnerID=40&md5=4608d08b52b097326ae77dd6b8b954bd | |
dc.description.abstract | The spatial distribution of PM10 and PM2.5 was observed at the e-waste dismantling community in Daengyai and Banpao subdistrict, Buriram, Thailand. High and low volume air samplers were used to collect PM10 and PM2.5 in the ambient air, respectively, at e-waste dismantling, non-e-waste dismantling, open dumpsite, and reference area. The sampling was performed during summer and rainy seasons of 2019 for 24 h and seven consecutive days. The average concentrations of PM10 were 49.64 ± 17.71, 55.36 ± 17.46 and 57.61 ± 17.55 µg/m3 at e-waste dismantling, non-e-waste dismantling, and open dump area, respectively. For PM2.5, the average concentrations at e-waste dismantling, non-e-waste dismantling, and open dump area were 29.71 ± 14.28, 33.81 ± 18.85, 30.68 ± 13.53 µg/m3, respectively. PM10 levels at open dumpsite were 1.2 and 1.1 times higher than those of e-waste dismantling area and non-e-waste dismantling area. Meanwhile, ANOVA analysis showed no significant differences (p > 0.05) of PM10 concentration between non- and e-waste dismantling, and open dumpsite. The level of PM2.5 at the e-waste dismantling area was only higher than the reference area but lower than non-e-waste dismantling and open dump area. Besides, there was no statistically significant difference between all sampling sites for PM2.5 concentration. PM10 at non-e-waste dismantling area and open dumpsite were exceeded guidelines of WHO (50 µg/m3), and also PM2.5 (25 µg/m3) of all sampling areas. In this e-waste community, there is no zoning provided for e-waste dismantling activities. Consequently, e-waste dismantling houses were randomly distributed in the community. Consequently, it can be indicated that e-waste dismantling activities led to more PM10 contribution than PM2.5. © Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020. | |
dc.subject | Planning | |
dc.subject | Spatial distribution | |
dc.subject | Sustainable development | |
dc.subject | Wastes | |
dc.subject | ANOVA analysis | |
dc.subject | Average concentration | |
dc.subject | PM10 and PM2.5 | |
dc.subject | PM10 concentration | |
dc.subject | PM2.5 concentration | |
dc.subject | Randomly distributed | |
dc.subject | Sampling areas | |
dc.subject | Statistically significant difference | |
dc.subject | Electronic Waste | |
dc.title | Spatial distribution of pm10 and PM2.5 in Ambient Air at E-waste Dismantling Community in Buriram, Thailand | |
dc.type | Conference Paper | |
dc.rights.holder | Scopus | |
dc.identifier.bibliograpycitation | Environmental Science and Engineering. (2020), p.371-379 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/978-3-030-45263-6_33 | |
Appears in Collections: | Scopus 1983-2021 |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in SWU repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.