Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ir.swu.ac.th/jspui/handle/123456789/12106
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChanthahong S.
dc.contributor.authorPrueksasit T.
dc.contributor.authorSahanavin N.
dc.contributor.authorKanjanasiranont N.
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-05T03:01:56Z-
dc.date.available2021-04-05T03:01:56Z-
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.issn18635520
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85087004495
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.swu.ac.th/jspui/handle/123456789/12106-
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85087004495&doi=10.1007%2f978-3-030-45263-6_33&partnerID=40&md5=4608d08b52b097326ae77dd6b8b954bd
dc.description.abstractThe spatial distribution of PM10 and PM2.5 was observed at the e-waste dismantling community in Daengyai and Banpao subdistrict, Buriram, Thailand. High and low volume air samplers were used to collect PM10 and PM2.5 in the ambient air, respectively, at e-waste dismantling, non-e-waste dismantling, open dumpsite, and reference area. The sampling was performed during summer and rainy seasons of 2019 for 24 h and seven consecutive days. The average concentrations of PM10 were 49.64 ± 17.71, 55.36 ± 17.46 and 57.61 ± 17.55 µg/m3 at e-waste dismantling, non-e-waste dismantling, and open dump area, respectively. For PM2.5, the average concentrations at e-waste dismantling, non-e-waste dismantling, and open dump area were 29.71 ± 14.28, 33.81 ± 18.85, 30.68 ± 13.53 µg/m3, respectively. PM10 levels at open dumpsite were 1.2 and 1.1 times higher than those of e-waste dismantling area and non-e-waste dismantling area. Meanwhile, ANOVA analysis showed no significant differences (p > 0.05) of PM10 concentration between non- and e-waste dismantling, and open dumpsite. The level of PM2.5 at the e-waste dismantling area was only higher than the reference area but lower than non-e-waste dismantling and open dump area. Besides, there was no statistically significant difference between all sampling sites for PM2.5 concentration. PM10 at non-e-waste dismantling area and open dumpsite were exceeded guidelines of WHO (50 µg/m3), and also PM2.5 (25 µg/m3) of all sampling areas. In this e-waste community, there is no zoning provided for e-waste dismantling activities. Consequently, e-waste dismantling houses were randomly distributed in the community. Consequently, it can be indicated that e-waste dismantling activities led to more PM10 contribution than PM2.5. © Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020.
dc.subjectPlanning
dc.subjectSpatial distribution
dc.subjectSustainable development
dc.subjectWastes
dc.subjectANOVA analysis
dc.subjectAverage concentration
dc.subjectPM10 and PM2.5
dc.subjectPM10 concentration
dc.subjectPM2.5 concentration
dc.subjectRandomly distributed
dc.subjectSampling areas
dc.subjectStatistically significant difference
dc.subjectElectronic Waste
dc.titleSpatial distribution of pm10 and PM2.5 in Ambient Air at E-waste Dismantling Community in Buriram, Thailand
dc.typeConference Paper
dc.rights.holderScopus
dc.identifier.bibliograpycitationEnvironmental Science and Engineering. (2020), p.371-379
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/978-3-030-45263-6_33
Appears in Collections:Scopus 1983-2021

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in SWU repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.