Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ir.swu.ac.th/jspui/handle/123456789/12083
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorThanathornwong B.
dc.contributor.authorJalayondeja W.
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-05T03:01:51Z-
dc.date.available2021-04-05T03:01:51Z-
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.issn21682372
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85084092872
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.swu.ac.th/jspui/handle/123456789/12083-
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85084092872&doi=10.1109%2fJTEHM.2020.2990527&partnerID=40&md5=6a8f4d7bb88c3d1f0ac8ddb612372a12
dc.description.abstractMultiple studies have suggested that some associations exist between occlusal factors and postural alterations. Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a vibrotactile posture trainer device, comprised a wearable device containing an accelerometer sensor to measure the angle of the neck flexion (input) and provided real-time vibrotactile biofeedback (output) for postural balance among patients with malocclusion. Methods: Twenty-four subjects were divided in 3 groups based on occlusion and using Angle's classification. Each group consisted of 8 patients for class I, II and III malocclusion. The Posture Trainer System was used for feedback concerning neck flexion angles when higher than 15 degrees. A 4-week training program to adjust posture balance in 2 axes (flexion-extension, lateral-flexion) was applied in activities for daily living. The assessments in this study were comprised of neck flexion angles from the Posture Trainer System and the center of pressure ( text{N}cdot text{m} ) using a force plate. The effects of a vibrotactile posture trainer (baseline vs. post-training test) were evaluated using the paired t-test and were assumed to be significant at p < 0.05 (two-side). All analyses were conducted using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences, Version 21.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). Results: Neck flexion angles and center of pressure significantly decreased post-training by the Posture Trainer System among patients with class II malocclusion. No changes in the above parameters post-training were found in class I and class III. Conclusion: The results demonstrated that patients with class II malocclusion training by the Posture Trainer System lowered neck flexion angles and COP compared with pre-training. Clinical Impact: Feedback by the Posture Trainer System can help improve the postural balance in class II malocclusion. © 2013 IEEE.
dc.subjectBiofeedback
dc.subjectFeedback
dc.subjectAccelerometer sensor
dc.subjectCenter of pressure
dc.subjectFlexion extension
dc.subjectPostural balance
dc.subjectStatistical packages
dc.subjectTraining program
dc.subjectVibro-tactile feedbacks
dc.subjectWearable devices
dc.subjectDentistry
dc.subjectadult
dc.subjectArticle
dc.subjectbody equilibrium
dc.subjectbody position
dc.subjectclinical article
dc.subjectcontrolled study
dc.subjectdaily life activity
dc.subjectdata analysis software
dc.subjectfemale
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectmale
dc.subjectmalocclusion
dc.titleVibrotactile -Feedback Device for Postural Balance among Malocclusion Patients
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.holderScopus
dc.identifier.bibliograpycitationIEEE Journal of Translational Engineering in Health and Medicine. Vol 8, (2020)
dc.identifier.doi10.1109/JTEHM.2020.2990527
Appears in Collections:Scopus 1983-2021

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in SWU repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.