Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ir.swu.ac.th/jspui/handle/123456789/12083
Title: Vibrotactile -Feedback Device for Postural Balance among Malocclusion Patients
Authors: Thanathornwong B.
Jalayondeja W.
Keywords: Biofeedback
Feedback
Accelerometer sensor
Center of pressure
Flexion extension
Postural balance
Statistical packages
Training program
Vibro-tactile feedbacks
Wearable devices
Dentistry
adult
Article
body equilibrium
body position
clinical article
controlled study
daily life activity
data analysis software
female
human
male
malocclusion
Issue Date: 2020
Abstract: Multiple studies have suggested that some associations exist between occlusal factors and postural alterations. Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a vibrotactile posture trainer device, comprised a wearable device containing an accelerometer sensor to measure the angle of the neck flexion (input) and provided real-time vibrotactile biofeedback (output) for postural balance among patients with malocclusion. Methods: Twenty-four subjects were divided in 3 groups based on occlusion and using Angle's classification. Each group consisted of 8 patients for class I, II and III malocclusion. The Posture Trainer System was used for feedback concerning neck flexion angles when higher than 15 degrees. A 4-week training program to adjust posture balance in 2 axes (flexion-extension, lateral-flexion) was applied in activities for daily living. The assessments in this study were comprised of neck flexion angles from the Posture Trainer System and the center of pressure ( text{N}cdot text{m} ) using a force plate. The effects of a vibrotactile posture trainer (baseline vs. post-training test) were evaluated using the paired t-test and were assumed to be significant at p < 0.05 (two-side). All analyses were conducted using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences, Version 21.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). Results: Neck flexion angles and center of pressure significantly decreased post-training by the Posture Trainer System among patients with class II malocclusion. No changes in the above parameters post-training were found in class I and class III. Conclusion: The results demonstrated that patients with class II malocclusion training by the Posture Trainer System lowered neck flexion angles and COP compared with pre-training. Clinical Impact: Feedback by the Posture Trainer System can help improve the postural balance in class II malocclusion. © 2013 IEEE.
URI: https://ir.swu.ac.th/jspui/handle/123456789/12083
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85084092872&doi=10.1109%2fJTEHM.2020.2990527&partnerID=40&md5=6a8f4d7bb88c3d1f0ac8ddb612372a12
ISSN: 21682372
Appears in Collections:Scopus 1983-2021

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in SWU repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.