Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ir.swu.ac.th/jspui/handle/123456789/12043
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBehr N.S.
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-05T03:01:41Z-
dc.date.available2021-04-05T03:01:41Z-
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.issn24523151
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85049727600
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.swu.ac.th/jspui/handle/123456789/12043-
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85049727600&doi=10.1016%2fj.kjss.2018.05.017&partnerID=40&md5=88d8c03049a2c54492bc86f584733799
dc.description.abstractThe Mon language, a register language, has a number of vowels with on-gliding phases that could eventually develop into diphthongs. These have never been acoustically studied. The objective of this study was to clarify the vowel characteristics in order to assess the possibility for change toward a restructured language. The results showed that some F1, F2, and F3 values in Burmese Mon (BM) could be used to differentiate clear from breathy vowels, especially in the on-gliding phase. F3 values as well as a tendency to diph-thongization could be crucial factors in how BM vowels differ from Thai Mon (TM) vowels. Nonetheless, it is likely to take some time to justify whether the Mon language will change and whether BM will ultimately become a different language type from TM. These Mon varieties seem to be on the continuum of language change. © 2018 Kasetsart University. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V.
dc.titleContrast in vowel quality in burmese and Thai mon varieties: Phonetic indicators towards a restructured language
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.holderScopus
dc.identifier.bibliograpycitationKasetsart Journal of Social Sciences. Vol 41, No.1 (2020), p.200-207
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.kjss.2018.05.017
Appears in Collections:Scopus 1983-2021

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in SWU repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.