Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ir.swu.ac.th/jspui/handle/123456789/11836
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDuongthipthewa O.
dc.contributor.authorUliss P.
dc.contributor.authorPattarasritanawong P.
dc.contributor.authorSukaimod P.
dc.contributor.authorOuypornkochagorn T.
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-05T03:01:16Z-
dc.date.available2021-04-05T03:01:16Z-
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85088163062
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.swu.ac.th/jspui/handle/123456789/11836-
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85088163062&doi=10.1145%2f3397391.3397433&partnerID=40&md5=c6e071574a5efd38598b72cac4f79da5
dc.description.abstractA non-invasive method based on Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT) is represented here to determine the bladder volume which indicates the volume of urine. Two different current patterns using with EIT i.e. opposite pattern and adjacent pattern (which is more popular) were investigated by simulation on six 3D-realistic models including bone, rectum, and bladder. Sixteen electrodes were attached by two-plane configuration. Five geometries of the bladder having different volumes were used to determine the boundary voltage response to the conductivity change. A case of the bladder volumes was used to determine the performance of image reconstruction of these patterns. The simulation result shows a strong correlation between the voltage responses and the volume changes, in inverse manner. Using the opposite pattern conducted larger amplitude voltage response than using the adjacent pattern, and resulted in higher sensitivity in the upper mid-region between the electrode planes. The reconstruction image of both patterns can clearly locate the bladder. The reconstructed bladder in the case of using the opposite pattern is larger in amplitude than using the adjacent pattern. However, the image of the opposite pattern has more artifacts at the boundary. This is probably due to the incomparable number of current patterns and measurements of each pattern, and the insufficiency of the current flow patterns of the opposite pattern designed in this study. The higher sensitivity to noise and error of the opposite pattern is probably another cause as well. © 2020 ACM.
dc.subjectBiomedical engineering
dc.subjectElectric impedance
dc.subjectElectric impedance measurement
dc.subjectElectric impedance tomography
dc.subjectElectrodes
dc.subjectNoninvasive medical procedures
dc.subjectAdjacent patterns
dc.subjectConductivity changes
dc.subjectElectrical impe dance tomography (EIT)
dc.subjectNoninvasive methods
dc.subjectPlane configurations
dc.subjectReconstruction image
dc.subjectStrong correlation
dc.subjectVoltage response
dc.subjectImage reconstruction
dc.titleAnalysis of Current Patterns to Determine the Bladder Volume by Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT)
dc.typeConference Paper
dc.rights.holderScopus
dc.identifier.bibliograpycitationACM International Conference Proceeding Series. (2020), p.122-127
dc.identifier.doi10.1145/3397391.3397433
Appears in Collections:Scopus 1983-2021

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in SWU repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.