DSpace Repository

The simplified tailor-made workflows for a 3D slicer-based craniofacial implant design

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Tantisatirapong S.
dc.contributor.author Khunakornpattanakarn S.
dc.contributor.author Suesatsakul T.
dc.contributor.author Boonpratatong A.
dc.contributor.author Benjamin I.
dc.contributor.author Tongmeesee S.
dc.contributor.author Kangkorn T.
dc.contributor.author Chanwimalueang T.
dc.contributor.other Srinakharinwirot University
dc.date.accessioned 2023-11-15T02:09:17Z
dc.date.available 2023-11-15T02:09:17Z
dc.date.issued 2023
dc.identifier.uri https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85148346890&doi=10.1038%2fs41598-023-30117-w&partnerID=40&md5=93f88fe43d5f491857e81aaa83b6fc64
dc.identifier.uri https://ir.swu.ac.th/jspui/handle/123456789/29595
dc.description.abstract A specific design of craniofacial implant model is vital and urgent for patients with traumatic head injury. The mirror technique is commonly used for modeling these implants, but it requires the presence of a healthy skull region opposite to the defect. To address this limitation, we propose three processing workflows for modeling craniofacial implants: the mirror method, the baffle planner, and the baffle-based mirror guideline. These workflows are based on extension modules on the 3D Slicer platform and were developed to simplify the modeling process for a variety of craniofacial scenarios. To evaluate the effectiveness of these proposed workflows, we investigated craniofacial CT datasets collected from four accidental cases. The designed implant models were created using the three proposed workflows and compared to reference models created by an experienced neurosurgeon. The spatial properties of the models were evaluated using performance metrics. Our results show that the mirror method is suitable for cases where a healthy skull region can be completely reflected to the defect region. The baffle planner module offers a flexible prototype model that can be fit independently to any defect location, but it requires customized refinement of contour and thickness to fill the missing region seamlessly and relies on the user's experience and expertise. The proposed baffle-based mirror guideline method strengthens the baffle planner method by tracing the mirrored surface. Overall, our study suggests that the three proposed workflows for craniofacial implant modeling simplify the process and can be practically applied to a variety of craniofacial scenarios. These findings have the potential to improve the care of patients with traumatic head injuries and could be used by neurosurgeons and other medical professionals. © 2023, The Author(s).
dc.publisher Nature Research
dc.title The simplified tailor-made workflows for a 3D slicer-based craniofacial implant design
dc.type Article
dc.rights.holder Scopus
dc.identifier.bibliograpycitation Scientific Reports. Vol 13, No.1 (2023)
dc.identifier.doi 10.1038/s41598-023-30117-w


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Statistics