DSpace Repository

Comparative study of biomechanical properties between needled suture and needleless suture in multi-strand tendon graft model

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Mahasupachai N.
dc.contributor.author Chanlalit C.
dc.contributor.author Sakdapanichkul C.
dc.date.accessioned 2022-03-10T13:16:36Z
dc.date.available 2022-03-10T13:16:36Z
dc.date.issued 2021
dc.identifier.issn 1252208
dc.identifier.other 2-s2.0-85115422851
dc.identifier.uri https://ir.swu.ac.th/jspui/handle/123456789/17187
dc.identifier.uri https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85115422851&doi=10.35755%2fjmedassocthai.2021.09.12507&partnerID=40&md5=70960dd783e9e73492c937be2968a6f6
dc.description.abstract Objective: To compare the biomechanical properties of the Chinese finger (CF) suture, a needleless suture technique, with the baseball stitch (BS) suture, a needled suture technique, in a multi-strand model by using a 4-strand tendon model. Additionally, the BS was compared with the serial rolling hitch (RH), a locking needleless suture technique. Materials and Methods: 4-strand grafts, made from two 20-cm fresh porcine toe extensors, were used in all three groups. After the grafts were sutured, pretension was applied with a load of 100-N distraction force for five minutes. After the tendon elongation was measured before and after the pretension, the distraction force was continued until the constructed graft failed. Stress-strain relationship graphs were recorded by universal testing machine (UTM), distributing to the calculation of percentage on tendon elongation, stiffness, and load-to-failure. Results: The BS had significantly higher load of failure than the CF (p=0.001) but no significant difference when compared with the RH. Comparing between BS, CF, and RH, there were no significant difference in stiffness and percentage of tendon elongation. In modes of failure, there was evidence of knot slipping in CF in six of six cases and graft strangulation in RH in four of six cases. Conclusion: Multi-strand model BS, a needled suture, had a higher load to failure than CF, a needleless suture. Moreover, needleless sutures had serious modes of failure, which were knot slipping and strangulation of graft by the suture material. Therefore, needleless suture technique for multi-strand tendon graft preparation was not recommended. © JOURNAL OF THE MEDICAL ASSOCIATION OF THAILAND | 2021.
dc.language en
dc.subject animal experiment
dc.subject animal model
dc.subject anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
dc.subject Article
dc.subject baseball
dc.subject baseball stitch suture
dc.subject biomechanics
dc.subject calculation
dc.subject comparative study
dc.subject electromyography
dc.subject graft elongation
dc.subject locking needleless suture technique
dc.subject needled suture technique
dc.subject needleless suture technique
dc.subject nonhuman
dc.subject pig
dc.subject rigidity
dc.subject serial rolling hitch
dc.subject stress strain relationship
dc.subject suture technique
dc.subject tendon elongation
dc.subject tendon graft
dc.subject tensile strength
dc.subject toe
dc.subject universal testing machine
dc.title Comparative study of biomechanical properties between needled suture and needleless suture in multi-strand tendon graft model
dc.type Article
dc.rights.holder Scopus
dc.identifier.bibliograpycitation Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand. Vol 104, No.9 (2021), p.1447-1451
dc.identifier.doi 10.35755/jmedassocthai.2021.09.12507


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Statistics