DSpace Repository

A comparison of microtensile bond strengths of several dentin bonding systems to primary and permanent dentin

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Burrow M.F.
dc.contributor.author Nopnakeepong U.
dc.contributor.author Phrukkanon S.
dc.date.accessioned 2021-04-05T04:33:05Z
dc.date.available 2021-04-05T04:33:05Z
dc.date.issued 2002
dc.identifier.issn 1095641
dc.identifier.other 2-s2.0-0036582511
dc.identifier.uri https://ir.swu.ac.th/jspui/handle/123456789/15224
dc.identifier.uri https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-0036582511&doi=10.1016%2fS0109-5641%2801%2900041-0&partnerID=40&md5=1d04d15419824de0ca9595752a0b0e7b
dc.description.abstract Objectives: Limited information exists with regard to the adhesive ability of glass ionomer cements (GIC) and recently developed resin-based dentin bond systems to primary dentin. The aim of this study was to compare the microtensile bond strength of a conventional GIC (Fuji IX), a resin-modified GIC (Fuji II LC), and two resin-based dentin adhesives (Prime and Bond NT with NRC and Single Bond). The bonded interfaces were also observed using field emission electron microscopy(FE-SEM). Methods: Microtensile bond test specimens were prepared on superficial dentin of primary and permanent molars. The specimens were bonded according to each manufacturer's instructions except for Prime and Bond NT/NRC which used Silux Plus resin composite instead of Dyract. Hour-glass shaped specimens were created (diameter of 1.2±0.02mm) and stressed in tension at a crosshead speed of 1mm/min. Results were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and LSD test, fracture modes were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U-test and Kruskall-Wallis test. Twelve specimens were prepared for each material on primary and permanent dentin. Samples were prepared in the same manner, then critical point dried, fractured and sputter-coated for the FE-SEM observations. Results: Two-way ANOVA showed the overall bond strengths were greater for the permanent dentin compared with primary dentin. However, for individual material comparisons no differences among the bond strengths to primary and permanent dentin for Fuji IX (9.7, 12.2MPa), Fuji II LC (16, 20.1MPa), Prime & Bond NT/NRC (18.1, 21.6MPa) and Single Bond (18.2, 21.6MPa), were detected. However, Fuji IX bond strengths were significantly lower than the other systems tested when bonded to either primary or permanent dentin (p<0.05). Failure mode showed cohesive failure of GIC and mostly adhesive failure for the resin-based adhesives. The FE-SEM observations showed hybrid-like layer formation for the GIC materials and hybrid layer formation for the resin-based adhesives. Significance: The materials tested would be suitable for bonding to either primary or permanent dentin, but the resin-modified GIC or resin-based systems are likely to provide a stronger bond than the conventional GIC, Fuji IX. © 2002 Academy of Dental Materials. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
dc.subject Adhesives
dc.subject Bond strength (materials)
dc.subject Bonding
dc.subject Dental cement
dc.subject Glass
dc.subject Ionomers
dc.subject Resins
dc.subject Scanning electron microscopy
dc.subject Tensile strength
dc.subject Tensile testing
dc.subject Dentin bonding agents
dc.subject Glass ionomers
dc.subject Microtensile bond tests
dc.subject Permanent dentin
dc.subject Primary dentin
dc.subject Dental materials
dc.subject bisphenol A bis(2 hydroxypropyl) ether dimethacrylate
dc.subject compomer
dc.subject dentin bonding agent
dc.subject Dyract
dc.subject Fuji II LC cement
dc.subject fuji IX
dc.subject glass ionomer
dc.subject maleic acid derivative
dc.subject methacrylic acid derivative
dc.subject non rinse conditioner
dc.subject non-rinse conditioner
dc.subject polymethacrylic acid derivative
dc.subject Prime & Bond NT
dc.subject resin
dc.subject resin cement
dc.subject silicate
dc.subject Silux Plus
dc.subject single bond
dc.subject analysis of variance
dc.subject article
dc.subject chemistry
dc.subject comparative study
dc.subject deciduous tooth
dc.subject dental acid etching
dc.subject dental bonding
dc.subject dentin
dc.subject human
dc.subject materials testing
dc.subject molar tooth
dc.subject nonparametric test
dc.subject scanning electron microscopy
dc.subject statistics
dc.subject surface property
dc.subject tensile strength
dc.subject ultrastructure
dc.subject Acid Etching, Dental
dc.subject Analysis of Variance
dc.subject Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate
dc.subject Compomers
dc.subject Composite Resins
dc.subject Dental Bonding
dc.subject Dentin
dc.subject Dentin-Bonding Agents
dc.subject Glass Ionomer Cements
dc.subject Humans
dc.subject Maleates
dc.subject Materials Testing
dc.subject Methacrylates
dc.subject Microscopy, Electron, Scanning
dc.subject Molar
dc.subject Polymethacrylic Acids
dc.subject Resin Cements
dc.subject Resins, Synthetic
dc.subject Silicates
dc.subject Statistics
dc.subject Statistics, Nonparametric
dc.subject Surface Properties
dc.subject Tensile Strength
dc.subject Tooth, Deciduous
dc.title A comparison of microtensile bond strengths of several dentin bonding systems to primary and permanent dentin
dc.type Article
dc.rights.holder Scopus
dc.identifier.bibliograpycitation Dental Materials. Vol 18, No.3 (2002), p.239-245
dc.identifier.doi 10.1016/S0109-5641(01)00041-0


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Statistics