DSpace Repository

Can we rely on the size of the lymph node in determining nodal metastasis in ovarian carcinoma?

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Tangjitgamol S.
dc.contributor.author Manusirivithaya S.
dc.contributor.author Sheanakul C.
dc.contributor.author Leelahakorn S.
dc.contributor.author Sripramote M.
dc.contributor.author Thawaramara T.
dc.contributor.author Kaewpila N.
dc.date.accessioned 2021-04-05T04:32:53Z
dc.date.available 2021-04-05T04:32:53Z
dc.date.issued 2003
dc.identifier.issn 1048891X
dc.identifier.other 2-s2.0-0642284876
dc.identifier.uri https://ir.swu.ac.th/jspui/handle/123456789/15186
dc.identifier.uri https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-0642284876&doi=10.1046%2fj.1525-1438.2003.13192.x&partnerID=40&md5=cf2f12e926c5b76507a681df56a1131b
dc.description.abstract This study endeavored to determine whether lymph node size is a reliable indicator in determining lymph node metastasis in common epithelial ovarian cancer. We reviewed pathologic sections of pelvic and para-aortic lymph nodes removed from 104 ovarian carcinoma patients who underwent either primary surgical staging or secondary surgery from January 1994 to July 2001. All sections of each individual node were measured in two dimensions. The different sizes of nodes were studied statistically to determine the optimal sensitivity and specificity in predicting cancer metastasis. A nodal size of 10 mm was a specific point of interest. Of 2069 total nodes obtained, 110 nodes (5.3%) had metastatic cancer. More than half (55.4%) of these positive nodes had a nodal long axis of 10 mm and less. The sensitivity and specificity of nodal size at 10 mm were 44.5% and 81.1%, respectively. We conclude that lymph node size is not a good indicator in determining epithelial ovarian cancer metastasis. Mere sampling of only the enlarged nodes does not reflect the true positive incidence of nodal metastasis. To avoid inaccurate staging and improper management, complete lymph node dissection is proposed as part of surgical staging for ovarian cancer.
dc.subject cancer size
dc.subject female
dc.subject human
dc.subject human tissue
dc.subject incidence
dc.subject lymph node
dc.subject lymph node metastasis
dc.subject lymphadenectomy
dc.subject major clinical study
dc.subject ovary carcinoma
dc.subject priority journal
dc.subject review
dc.subject adenocarcinoma
dc.subject article
dc.subject cancer staging
dc.subject lymph node
dc.subject lymph node metastasis
dc.subject lymphadenectomy
dc.subject methodology
dc.subject morphometrics
dc.subject ovary tumor
dc.subject pathology
dc.subject prediction and forecasting
dc.subject Adenocarcinoma
dc.subject Body Weights and Measures
dc.subject Female
dc.subject Humans
dc.subject Lymph Node Excision
dc.subject Lymph Nodes
dc.subject Lymphatic Metastasis
dc.subject Neoplasm Staging
dc.subject Ovarian Neoplasms
dc.subject Predictive Value of Tests
dc.title Can we rely on the size of the lymph node in determining nodal metastasis in ovarian carcinoma?
dc.type Review
dc.rights.holder Scopus
dc.identifier.bibliograpycitation International Journal of Gynecological Cancer. Vol 13, No.3 (2003), p.297-302
dc.identifier.doi 10.1046/j.1525-1438.2003.13192.x


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Statistics