DSpace Repository

Evaluation of biomimetic scaffold of gelatin-hydroxyapatite crosslink as a novel scaffold for tissue engineering: Biocompatibility evaluation with human PDL fibroblasts, human mesenchymal stromal cells, and primary bone cells

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Rungsiyanont S.
dc.contributor.author Dhanesuan N.
dc.contributor.author Swasdison S.
dc.contributor.author Kasugai S.
dc.date.accessioned 2021-04-05T03:34:06Z
dc.date.available 2021-04-05T03:34:06Z
dc.date.issued 2012
dc.identifier.issn 8853282
dc.identifier.other 2-s2.0-84863653015
dc.identifier.uri https://ir.swu.ac.th/jspui/handle/123456789/14315
dc.identifier.uri https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84863653015&doi=10.1177%2f0885328210391920&partnerID=40&md5=f2da7828a7030a0bae8023f75e79a194
dc.description.abstract Biomimetic gelatin (gel)-hydroxyapatite (HA) composites have been prepared for studying hard tissue engineering scaffolds. However, the biocompatibility test of this form of material using these three cell types, which are periodontal ligament (PDL) fibroblast cells, human mesenchymal stromal cells (HMSc) and primary cells from human hip bone (HBc) has never been evaluated. The objective of this article is to prepare and evaluate the biocompatibility of gel-HA crosslinked scaffold for tissue engineering. Two different scaffolds were prepared: preparation (1), 2.5% gel/2.5% HA; preparation (2), 2.5% gel/5% HA. Three cell types including PDL, HMSc, and HBc were used. Assessment of biocompatibility and osteoblastic cellular responses was evaluated using a three-dimensional cell culture method and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). From SEM, it was observed that scaffold (1) exhibits stable porous formation with well-blended and dispersed HA powder. All three cell types were able to proliferate in both scaffolds. The HMSc and HBc got attached to the scaffolds to a significantly higher degree and subsequently proliferated more than PDL. The alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activities of HMSc and HBc were stronger when cultured in scaffold (S1) than (S2). It was seen that the two scaffold preparations show good biocompatibility with all three cell types tested. The better cellular responses with scaffold (S1) than (S2) might be due to the different structural and morphological characteristics, that is, scaffold (S1) retained more small-sized apatite crystals and a better developed pore configuration than scaffold (S2). Based on these findings, the biomimetically synthesized composite scaffolds have the potential to be used in hard tissue regeneration and tissue engineering fields. © The Author(s) 2010 Reprints and permissions.
dc.subject Alkaline phosphatase activity
dc.subject Apatite crystals
dc.subject Biomimetic scaffolds
dc.subject Bone cells
dc.subject Cell types
dc.subject Cellular response
dc.subject Composite scaffolds
dc.subject Crosslinked
dc.subject Crosslinks
dc.subject Fibroblast cells
dc.subject gelatin-hydroxyapatite
dc.subject HA powders
dc.subject Hard tissues
dc.subject Mesenchymal stromal cells
dc.subject Morphological characteristic
dc.subject Periodontal ligament
dc.subject Pore configuration
dc.subject Primary cells
dc.subject Three dimensional cell culture
dc.subject Biocompatibility
dc.subject Biomimetics
dc.subject Cell culture
dc.subject Fibroblasts
dc.subject Hydroxyapatite
dc.subject Phosphatases
dc.subject Phosphate minerals
dc.subject Scanning electron microscopy
dc.subject Tissue
dc.subject Tissue engineering
dc.subject Scaffolds (biology)
dc.subject gelatin
dc.subject hydroxyapatite
dc.subject tissue scaffold
dc.subject article
dc.subject biomimetics
dc.subject cell adhesion
dc.subject cell culture
dc.subject cell proliferation
dc.subject chemistry
dc.subject cytology
dc.subject evaluation
dc.subject fibroblast
dc.subject human
dc.subject mesenchymal stroma cell
dc.subject osteoblast
dc.subject periodontal ligament
dc.subject scanning electron microscopy
dc.subject tissue engineering
dc.subject Biomimetics
dc.subject Cell Adhesion
dc.subject Cell Proliferation
dc.subject Cells, Cultured
dc.subject Durapatite
dc.subject Fibroblasts
dc.subject Gelatin
dc.subject Humans
dc.subject Mesenchymal Stromal Cells
dc.subject Microscopy, Electron, Scanning
dc.subject Osteoblasts
dc.subject Periodontal Ligament
dc.subject Tissue Engineering
dc.subject Tissue Scaffolds
dc.title Evaluation of biomimetic scaffold of gelatin-hydroxyapatite crosslink as a novel scaffold for tissue engineering: Biocompatibility evaluation with human PDL fibroblasts, human mesenchymal stromal cells, and primary bone cells
dc.type Article
dc.rights.holder Scopus
dc.identifier.bibliograpycitation Journal of Biomaterials Applications. Vol 27, No.1 (2012), p.47-54
dc.identifier.doi 10.1177/0885328210391920


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Statistics