DSpace Repository

Femoral fracture type can be predicted from femoral structure: A finite element study validated by digital volume correlation experiments

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Ridzwan M.I.Z.
dc.contributor.author Sukjamsri C.
dc.contributor.author Pal B.
dc.contributor.author van Arkel R.J.
dc.contributor.author Bell A.
dc.contributor.author Khanna M.
dc.contributor.author Baskaradas A.
dc.contributor.author Abel R.
dc.contributor.author Boughton O.
dc.contributor.author Cobb J.
dc.contributor.author Hansen U.N.
dc.date.accessioned 2021-04-05T03:21:37Z
dc.date.available 2021-04-05T03:21:37Z
dc.date.issued 2018
dc.identifier.issn 7360266
dc.identifier.other 2-s2.0-85044958576
dc.identifier.uri https://ir.swu.ac.th/jspui/handle/123456789/12797
dc.identifier.uri https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85044958576&doi=10.1002%2fjor.23669&partnerID=40&md5=74237dd96a22a1461ccbe13316aa24bf
dc.description.abstract Proximal femoral fractures can be categorized into two main types: Neck and intertrochanteric fractures accounting for 53% and 43% of all proximal femoral fractures, respectively. The possibility to predict the type of fracture a specific patient is predisposed to would allow drug and exercise therapies, hip protector design, and prophylactic surgery to be better targeted for this patient rendering fracture preventing strategies more effective. This study hypothesized that the type of fracture is closely related to the patient-specific femoral structure and predictable by finite element (FE) methods. Fourteen femora were DXA scanned, CT scanned, and mechanically tested to fracture. FE-predicted fracture patterns were compared to experimentally observed fracture patterns. Measurements of strain patterns to explain neck and intertrochanteric fracture patterns were performed using a digital volume correlation (DVC) technique and compared to FE-predicted strains and experimentally observed fracture patterns. Although loaded identically, the femora exhibited different fracture types (six neck and eight intertrochanteric fractures). CT-based FE models matched the experimental observations well (86%) demonstrating that the fracture type can be predicted. DVC-measured and FE-predicted strains showed obvious consistency. Neither DXA-based BMD nor any morphologic characteristics such as neck diameter, femoral neck length, or neck shaft angle were associated with fracture type. In conclusion, patient-specific femoral structure correlates with fracture type and FE analyses were able to predict these fracture types. Also, the demonstration of FE and DVC as metrics of the strains in bones may be of substantial clinical value, informing treatment strategies and device selection and design. © 2017 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 36:993–1001, 2018. © 2017 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.subject adult
dc.subject aged
dc.subject analysis
dc.subject Article
dc.subject bone structure
dc.subject cervical spine fracture
dc.subject digital volume correlation analysis
dc.subject dual energy X ray absorptiometry
dc.subject female
dc.subject femoral neck
dc.subject femur fracture
dc.subject femur intertrochanteric fracture
dc.subject human
dc.subject male
dc.subject mechanical stimulus test
dc.subject priority journal
dc.subject treatment planning
dc.subject x-ray computed tomography
dc.subject bone density
dc.subject diagnostic imaging
dc.subject femoral neck fracture
dc.subject femur
dc.subject finite element analysis
dc.subject middle aged
dc.subject validation study
dc.subject very elderly
dc.subject Adult
dc.subject Aged
dc.subject Aged, 80 and over
dc.subject Bone Density
dc.subject Female
dc.subject Femoral Neck Fractures
dc.subject Femur
dc.subject Finite Element Analysis
dc.subject Humans
dc.subject Male
dc.subject Middle Aged
dc.title Femoral fracture type can be predicted from femoral structure: A finite element study validated by digital volume correlation experiments
dc.type Article
dc.rights.holder Scopus
dc.identifier.bibliograpycitation Journal of Orthopaedic Research. Vol 36, No.3 (2018), p.993-1001
dc.identifier.doi 10.1002/jor.23669


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Statistics